Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36551700›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Retrospective Cohort Study of Practical Applications of Paramagnetic Seed Localisation in Breast Carcinoma and Other Malignancies.

Céline Clement, Lieve Schops, Ines Nevelsteen, Soetkin Thijssen, Chantal Van Ongeval, Machteld Keupers, Renate Prevos, Valerie Celis, Patrick Neven, Sileny Han and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Céline ClementMultidisciplinary Breast Centre Department Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Lieve SchopsDepartment Gynaecology, Noorderhart Ziekenhuis Pelt, 3900 Pelt, Belgium.
Ines NevelsteenMultidisciplinary Breast Centre Department Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Soetkin ThijssenDepartment Gynaecology, Noorderhart Ziekenhuis Pelt, 3900 Pelt, Belgium.
Chantal Van OngevalMultidisciplinary Breast Centre Department Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Machteld KeupersMultidisciplinary Breast Centre Department Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Renate PrevosMultidisciplinary Breast Centre Department Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Valerie CelisMultidisciplinary Breast Centre Department Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Patrick NevenMultidisciplinary Breast Centre Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1434-9460
Sileny HanMultidisciplinary Breast Centre Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Annouschka LaenenLeuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre (L-BioStat), 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Ann SmeetsMultidisciplinary Breast Centre Department Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5091-6602
KU Leuven · BEUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel · BEStatistics Belgium · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Paramagnetic seeds are a safe alternative for the wire-guided localisation of non-palpable breast lesions, but can also be applied for non-breast lesions. This study presents the experience with a paramagnetic seed, MagSeed® (Endomagnetics Ltd., Cambridge, UK, CE-registered and FDA-cleared), in an academic and non-academic breast centre. (2) Methods: Multicentre, retrospective analysis of 374 consecutive patients who underwent surgery after paramagnetic seed localisation (MSL) between 2018 and 2020. Indications for localisation included non-palpable breast lesions (n = 356), lymph nodes (n = 15) or soft tissue lesions (n = 3). The primary outcome was feasibility and the rate of positive section margins. The secondary outcome was predictive factors for positive section margins. (3) Results: The accurate excision of high-risk breast lesions, lymph nodes and soft tissue lesions was seen in 91.07% (n = 56). Positive section margins were observed in 7.86% (n = 25) after breast conserving surgery for invasive or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (n = 318). Invasive breast cancer associated with DCIS (p = 0.043) and the size of DCIS (p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with the positive section margins. (4) Conclusion: This study confirms the feasibility of MSL, as well as the higher risk for positive margins in cases of breast carcinoma with associated DCIS. Soft tissue lesions and lymph nodes associated with other malignancies, e.g., melanoma, can also be localised with paramagnetic seeds. This offers perspectives for future applications, such as the de-escalation of axillary treatment in breast cancer.

Indexed as

breast conserving surgeryparamagnetic seed localisation

Identifiers

PMID36551700
PMCPMC9777317
OpenAlexW4312140531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.