ArticleCancers2022
Characterization of Glioblastoma Cells Response to Regorafenib.
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pathway dysregulation and therapeutic resistance in glioblastoma: molecular mechanisms and emerging therapeutic targets.Future science OA · 2026Review
- Kinase-Targeted Therapies for Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- A Review of FDA-Approved Multi-Target Angiogenesis Drugs for Brain Tumor Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Glioblastoma multiforme: insights into pathogenesis, key signaling pathways, and therapeutic strategies.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine (NAC) Blunts Axitinib-Related Adverse Effects in Preclinical Models of Glioblastoma.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Regorafenib and glioblastoma: a literature review of preclinical studies, molecular mechanisms and clinical effectiveness.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Temozolomide, Procarbazine and Nitrosoureas in the Therapy of Malignant Gliomas: Update of Mechanisms, Drug Resistance and Therapeutic Implications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- A methylome-based score to predict survival after regorafenib in recurrent glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM), the most malignant primary brain tumor in adults. Although not frequent, it has a relevant social impact because the peak incidence coincides with the age of professional maturity. A number of novel treatments have been proposed, yet clinical trials have been disappointing. Recently, a phase II clinical trial (REGOMA) demonstrated that the multikinase inhibitor regorafenib significantly increased the median overall survival (OS) of GBM patients when compared to lomustine-treated patients. On this basis, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) 2020 Guidelines included regorafenib as a preferred regimen in relapsed GBM treatment. Despite the use in GBM patients' therapy, little is known about the molecular mechanisms governing regorafenib effectiveness on the GBM tumor. Here we report an in vitro characterization of GBM tumor cells' response to regorafenib, performed both on cell lines and on patient-derived glioma stem cells (GSCs). Overall, regorafenib significantly reduced cell growth of 2D tumor cell cultures and of 3D tumor spheroids. Strikingly, this effect was accompanied by transcriptional regulation of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) genes and by an increased ability of surviving tumor cells to invade the surrounding matrix. Taken together, our data suggest that regorafenib limits cell growth, however, it might induce an invasive phenotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.