ArticleCancers2022
Design of a Honey Badger Optimization Algorithm with a Deep Transfer Learning-Based Osteosarcoma Classification Model.
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and verification of a comprehensive diagnostic model for osteosarcoma using random forest and artificial neural network.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Neuro-fuzzy systems in internet of medical things: a systematic review on applications, taxonomy, challenges and open issues.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Integrative biomarker and drug target discovery in osteosarcoma: traditional experimental approaches and AI-enabled insights.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Primary Malignant Bone Tumor Imaging: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advanced hybrid deep learning model for enhanced evaluation of osteosarcoma histopathology images.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Detection of Cervical Foraminal Stenosis from Oblique Radiograph Using Convolutional Neural Network Algorithm.Yonsei medical journal · 2024Article
- Adaptive Aquila Optimizer with Explainable Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Cancer Diagnosis on Medical Imaging.Cancers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteosarcoma is one of the aggressive bone tumors with numerous histologic patterns. Histopathological inspection is a crucial criterion in the medical diagnosis of Osteosarcoma. Due to the advancement of computing power and hardware technology, pathological image analysis system based on artificial intelligence (AI) were more commonly used. But classifying many intricate pathology images by hand will be challenging for pathologists. The lack of labeling data makes the system difficult to build and costly. This article designs a Honey Badger Optimization with Deep Learning based Automated Osteosarcoma Classification (HBODL-AOC) model. The HBODL-AOC technique's goal is to identify osteosarcoma's existence using medical images. In the presented HBODL-AOC technique, image preprocessing is initially performed by contrast enhancement technique. For feature extraction, the HBODL-AOC technique employs a deep convolutional neural network-based Mobile networks (MobileNet) model with an Adam optimizer for hyperparameter tuning. Finally, the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) approach is implemented for the HBO (Honey Badger Optimization) algorithm can tune osteosarcoma classification and the membership function (MF). To demonstrate the enhanced classification performance of the HBODL-AOC approach, a sequence of simulations was performed. The extensive simulation analysis portrayed the improved performance of the HBODL-AOC technique over existing DL models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.