Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36551542›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in Young Adults, Age < 50, Is Associated with Late Stage at Presentation and a Very Poor Prognosis in Patients That Do Not Have a Targeted Therapy Option: A Real-World Study

Daniel Johnathan Hughes, Matthaios Kapiris, Andreja Podvez Nevajda, Harriet McGrath, Chara Stavraka, Shahreen Ahmad, Benjamin Taylor, Gary J R Cook, Sharmistha Ghosh, Debra Josephs and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. (-)-Epi-Osmundalactone-Rich Fraction fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Emerging Trends in Global Lung Cancer Burden.Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel Johnathan HughesDepartment of Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, Lambeth Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7EH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2641-7632
Matthaios KapirisCancer Centre at Guy's, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Andreja Podvez NevajdaCancer Centre at Guy's, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Harriet McGrathCancer Centre at Guy's, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Chara StavrakaCancer Centre at Guy's, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7623-299X
Shahreen AhmadCancer Centre at Guy's, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Benjamin TaylorCancer Centre at Guy's, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Gary J R CookDepartment of Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, Lambeth Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7EH, UK.
Sharmistha GhoshCancer Centre at Guy's, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Debra JosephsCancer Centre at Guy's, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Elias PintusCancer Centre at Guy's, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5123-1835
Spyridon GennatasCancer Centre at Guy's, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5635-7696
Andrea BilleCancer Centre at Guy's, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Kimuli RyannaCancer Centre at Guy's, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.
George SantisCancer Centre at Guy's, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Ana MontesCancer Centre at Guy's, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Mieke Van HemelrijckSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, Guy's Campus, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 1UL, UK.
Eleni KarapanagiotouCancer Centre at Guy's, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Daniel SmithCancer Centre at Guy's, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6330-3936
James SpicerCancer Centre at Guy's, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Alexandros GeorgiouCancer Centre at Guy's, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7500-9251
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16463Cancer Research UK C1519/A28682Wellcome Trust WT 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in young patients is uncommon. Real-world evidence on the outcomes of these patients is limited. (2) Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of young NSCLC patients, age < 50 years at diagnosis, who were treated between 2011−2020 in South-East-London cancer centres. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and outcomes were analysed. (3) Results: Of 248 NSCLC patients, median age was 46 years, 50% (n = 125) female, 58% (n = 145) white, 18% (n = 45) black and 4% (n = 10) Asian ethnicity. Amongst patients with a documented smoking history, 30% (n = 64) were never-smokers. Most patients had adenocarcinoma (77%, n = 191) and presented with metastatic disease (67%, n = 166). Only 31% (n = 76) had treatment with curative intent. In patients who presented or developed metastatic non-squamous NSCLC (n = 179), EGFR mutation status was known in 88% (n = 157) and mutation present in 19% (n = 34), ALK was known in 66% (n = 118) with a translocation in 10% (n = 18), ROS1 status was known in 57% (n = 102) with a translocation in 4% (n = 8), and KRAS status was known in 66% (n = 119) with a mutation in 12% (n = 22). Overall, 76% (n = 152) patients with metastatic NSCLC received first-line systemic anti-cancer therapy. Median overall survival in metastatic NSCLC was 9.0 months (95% CI 6.5−11.6 months), with superior median overall survival in those with a targeted therapy option (28.7 months) compared to those without (6.6 months; p < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: Young patients contribute a significant proportion of those presenting with lung cancer. They present with advanced stage at diagnosis and have a poor prognosis. Identification of a targeted therapy option is associated with improved survival. However, most patients do not have a known genomic driver, which is in part due to limited testing, particularly in the early years of this study period. These findings highlight the particular importance of rapid-turnaround comprehensive genomic profiling in this age group and the need to identify strategies to facilitate earlier diagnosis in young NSCLC patients.

Indexed as

genetic predictive testingmolecular targeted therapiesnon-small cell lung cancerprecision medicineyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID36551542
PMCPMC9776398
OpenAlexW4311970926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.