Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36551509›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Immunohistochemical Markers of the Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) Are Related to Extensive Lymph Nodal Spread, Peritoneal Dissemination, and Poor Prognosis in the Microsatellite-Stable Diffuse Histotype of Gastric Cancer.

Daniele Marrelli, Luigi Marano, Maria Raffaella Ambrosio, Ludovico Carbone, Luigi Spagnoli, Roberto Petrioli, Alessandra Ongaro, Stefania Piccioni, Daniele Fusario, Franco Roviello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical implications of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cancers which potentially spread to peritoneum.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniele MarrelliDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, Strade Delle Scotte 14, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2066-1618
Luigi MaranoDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, Strade Delle Scotte 14, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9777-9588
Maria Raffaella AmbrosioPathology Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Toscana Nord-Ovest, Via Cocchi 1, 56121 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1172-6902
Ludovico CarboneDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, Strade Delle Scotte 14, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2862-6788
Luigi SpagnoliPathology Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Toscana Nord-Ovest, Via Cocchi 1, 56121 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9476-7779
Roberto PetrioliDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of Medical Oncology, University of Siena, Strade Delle Scotte 14, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Alessandra OngaroDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, Strade Delle Scotte 14, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Stefania PiccioniDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, Strade Delle Scotte 14, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Daniele FusarioDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, Strade Delle Scotte 14, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2804-2814
Franco RovielloDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, Strade Delle Scotte 14, 53100 Siena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although the prognostic value of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in gastric cancer has been reported in several studies, the strong association with the diffuse type may represent a confounding factor. Our aim is to investigate potential correlations among EMT status, tumor advancement, and prognosis in diffuse gastric cancer. Methods: Between 1997 and 2012, 84 patients with microsatellite-stable (MSS) diffuse-type tumors underwent surgery. The EMT phenotype was assessed with the E-cadherin, CD44, and zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 (ZEB-1) immunohistochemical markers. Results: Forty-five out of 84 cases (54%) were EMT-positive; more advanced nodal status (p = 0.010), pTNM stage (p = 0.032), and vascular invasion (p = 0.037) were observed in this group. The median numbers of positive nodes (13 vs. 5) and involved nodal stations (4 vs. 2) were higher in the EMT-positive group. The cancer-related survival time was 26 months in EMT-positive cases vs. 51 in negative cases, with five-year survival rates of 17% vs. 51%, respectively (p = 0.001). The EMT status had an impact on the prognosis of patients with <70 years, R0 resections, or treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy. Tumor relapses after surgery and peritoneal spread were significantly higher in the EMT-positive tumors. Conclusions: EMT status, when assessed through immunohistochemistry, identified an aggressive phenotype of MSS diffuse-type tumors with extensive lymph nodal spread, peritoneal dissemination, and worse long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

diffuse histotypeepithelial-to-mesenchymal transitiongastric cancerimmunohistochemistrymicrosatellite-stable tumorsoutcomeprognosis

Identifiers

PMID36551509
PMCPMC9776345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.