Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36551455›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Utility of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review.

Sara F Haddad, Daniel C DeSimone, Supavit Chesdachai, Danielle J Gerberi, Larry M Baddour

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Two cases of Francisella tularensis subspecies holartica prosthetic valve endocarditis, and review of the literature.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. UnderstandingCells · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Finding ofGerms · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara F HaddadDivision of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7262-028X
Daniel C DeSimoneDivision of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Supavit ChesdachaiDivision of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3507-6411
Danielle J GerberiMayo Clinic Library Services, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1522-3915
Larry M BaddourDivision of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4473-7077
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood cultures have been the gold standard for identifying pathogens in infective endocarditis (IE). Blood culture-negative endocarditis (BCNE), however, occurs in 40% or more of IE cases with the bulk of them due to recent antibiotic exposure prior to obtaining blood cultures. Increasingly, molecular techniques are being used for pathogen identification in cases of BCNE and more recently has included metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS). We therefore performed a literature search on August 31, 2022, that assessed the mNGS in IE and 13 publications were identified and included in a systematic review. Eight (61.5%) of them focused only on IE with mNGS performed on cardiac valve tissue in four studies, plasma in three studies and cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) in one study. Gram-positive cocci, including Staphylococcus aureus (n = 31, 8.9%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 61, 17.6%), streptococci (n = 130, 37.5%), and Enterococcus faecalis (n = 23, 6.6%) were the predominant organisms identified by mNGS. Subsequent investigations are needed to further define the utility of mNGS in BCNE and its impact on patient outcomes. Despite some pitfalls, mNGS seems to be of value in pathogen identification in IE cases, particularly in those with BCNE. This study was registered and on the Open Science Framework platform.

Indexed as

cardiovascular implantable electronic devicesdevice-related infectionsdiagnosisinfective endocarditismetagenomic next-generation sequencingmolecular

Identifiers

PMID36551455
PMCPMC9774888
OpenAlexW4312125477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.