ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Antibiotic Therapy in the Critically Ill with Acute Renal Failure and Renal Replacement Therapy: A Narrative Review.
Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prescribing Patterns and Clinical Outcomes of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam by Renal Function and Body Mass Index: A SPECTRA Real-World Multi-Country Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of ceftazidime-avibactam in critically ill adult patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Exploring determinants in deciding the optimal antimicrobial dose in patients undergoing CRRT: a mixed-methods study.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025Article
- A narrative review on antimicrobial dosing in adult critically ill patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Review
- Drug-Drug Interactions in Nosocomial Infections: An Updated Review for Clinicians.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Therapeutic potential of urine-derived stem cells in renal regeneration following acute kidney injury: A comparative analysis with mesenchymal stem cells.World journal of stem cells · 2024Article
- Characterization of antibiotic prescription in intensive care units according to the Access, Watch, and Reserve classification.Revista CuidarteArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The outcome for critically ill patients is burdened by a double mortality rate and a longer hospital stay in the case of sepsis or septic shock. The adequate use of antibiotics may impact on the outcome since they may affect the pharmacokinetics (Pk) and pharmacodynamics (Pd) of antibiotics in such patients. Acute renal failure (ARF) occurs in about 50% of septic patients, and the consequent need for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) makes the renal elimination rate of most antibiotics highly variable. Antibiotics doses should be reduced in patients experiencing ARF, in accordance with the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), whereas posology should be increased in the case of CRRT. Since different settings of CRRT may be used, identifying a standard dosage of antibiotics is very difficult, because there is a risk of both oversimplification and failing the therapeutic efficacy. Indeed, it has been seen that, in over 25% of cases, the antibiotic therapy does not reach the necessary concentration target mainly due to lack of the proper minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) achievement. The aim of this narrative review is to clarify whether shared algorithms exist, allowing them to inform the daily practice in the proper antibiotics posology for critically ill patients undergoing CRRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.