Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36551398›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Continuous-Infusion Fosfomycin in Combination with Extended-Infusion Cefiderocol or Continuous-Infusion Ceftazidime-Avibactam in a Case Series of Difficult-to-Treat Resistant

Milo Gatti, Maddalena Giannella, Matteo Rinaldi, Paolo Gaibani, Pierluigi Viale, Federico Pea

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Difficult-to-TreatAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Intravenous Fosfomycin for Systemic Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Milo GattiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3018-3779
Maddalena GiannellaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Matteo RinaldiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Paolo GaibaniMicrobiology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3791-8635
Pierluigi VialeDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Federico PeaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6966-7167
Azienda USL di Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To perform a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis of continuous-infusion (CI) fosfomycin combined with extended-infusion (EI) cefiderocol or CI ceftazidime-avibactam in a case series of severe difficult-to-treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa (DTR-PA) infections. Methods: A single-center retrospective study of patients who were treated with CI fosfomycin plus EI cefiderocol or CI ceftazidime-avibactam for severe DTR-PA infections and who underwent therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), from 1 September 2021 to 30 June 2022 was performed. Concentrations were measured at steady-state (Css) for CI fosfomycin and ceftazidime-avibactam and at trough (Cmin) for EI cefiderocol. Joint PK/PD targets of combination therapy were analyzed (thresholds: area-under-the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) ratio > 40.8 for fosfomycin; ceftazidime Css/MIC ratio ≥ 4 coupled with avibactam Css > 4 mg/L for ceftazidime-avibactam; Cmin/MIC ratio ≥ 4 for cefiderocol). Joint PK/PD targets of the combination therapy were analyzed and defined as optimal when both were achieved, quasi-optimal if only one of the two was achieved, and suboptimal if none of the two was achieved). The relationship between joint PK/PD target attainment and microbiological response was assessed. Results: Six patients (three pneumonia, two BSI + pneumonia, and one BSI) were included. The joint PK/PD targets were optimal in four cases and quasi-optimal in the other two. Microbiological eradication (ME) occurred in 4/4 of patients with optimal joint PK/PD targets and in one of the two patients with quasi-optimal joint PK/PD targets. Conclusions: Attaining optimal joint PK/PD targets with a combo-therapy of CI fosfomycin plus EI cefiderocol or CI ceftazidime-avibactam could represent an effective strategy for granting favorable microbiological outcomes in patients with DTR-PA pneumonia and/or BSI.

Indexed as

cefiderocolceftazidime-avibactamcombination therapycontinuous infusionDTR-Pseudomonas aeruginosafosfomycinmicrobiological eradicationPK/PDTDM-guided strategy

Identifiers

PMID36551398
PMCPMC9774893
OpenAlexW4311522312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.