Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36551168›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2022

Entropy and Variability: A Second Opinion by Deep Learning.

Daniel T Rademaker, Li C Xue, Peter A C 't Hoen, Gert Vriend

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Daniel T RademakerCentre for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics (CMBI), Radboudumc, 260 Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1959-1317
Li C XueCentre for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics (CMBI), Radboudumc, 260 Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2613-538X
Peter A C 't HoenCentre for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics (CMBI), Radboudumc, 260 Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4450-3112
Gert VriendCentre for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics (CMBI), Radboudumc, 260 Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

Hypatia Fellowship from Radboudumc Rv819.52706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnalysis of the distribution of amino acid types found at equivalent positions in multiple sequence alignments has found applications in human genetics, protein engineering, drug design, protein structure prediction, and many other fields. These analyses tend to revolve around measures of the distribution of the twenty amino acid types found at evolutionary equivalent positions: the columns in multiple sequence alignments. Commonly used measures are variability, average hydrophobicity, or Shannon entropy. One of these techniques, called entropy-variability analysis, as the name already suggests, reduces the distribution of observed residue types in one column to two numbers: the Shannon entropy and the variability as defined by the number of residue types observed.

resultsWe applied a deep learning, unsupervised feature extraction method to analyse the multiple sequence alignments of all human proteins. An auto-encoder neural architecture was trained on 27,835 multiple sequence alignments for human proteins to obtain the two features that best describe the seven million variability patterns. These two unsupervised learned features strongly resemble entropy and variability, indicating that these are the projections that retain most information when reducing the dimensionality of the information hidden in columns in multiple sequence alignments.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsAmino AcidsAmino Acid SequenceHumansProteinsReferral and ConsultationAmino AcidsProteinsamino acidsbioinformaticsdeep learningentropyFAIRMSAPhilip Bournevariability

Identifiers

PMID36551168
PMCPMC9775329
OpenAlexW4310036806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.