Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36551098›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2022

Wearable Sensor-Based Monitoring of Environmental Exposures and the Associated Health Effects: A Review.

Xueer Lin, Jiaying Luo, Minyan Liao, Yalan Su, Mo Lv, Qing Li, Shenglan Xiao, Jianbang Xiang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xueer LinSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China.
Jiaying LuoSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China.
Minyan LiaoSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China.
Yalan SuSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China.
Mo LvSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China.
Qing LiCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China.
Shenglan XiaoSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China.
Jianbang XiangSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5196-2574
Sun Yat-sen University · CNNortheastern University · CN

Funding

Beijing Key Laboratory of Indoor Air Quality Evaluation and Control No. BZ0344KF21-05Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Sun Yat-sen University No. 22qntd4308State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex No. SCAPC202106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in sensor technology have facilitated the development and use of personalized sensors in monitoring environmental factors and the associated health effects. No studies have reviewed the research advancement in examining population-based health responses to environmental exposure via portable sensors/instruments. This study aims to review studies that use portable sensors to measure environmental factors and health responses while exploring the environmental effects on health. With a thorough literature review using two major English databases (Web of Science and PubMed), 24 eligible studies were included and analyzed out of 16,751 total records. The 24 studies include 5 on physical factors, 19 on chemical factors, and none on biological factors. The results show that particles were the most considered environmental factor among all of the physical, chemical, and biological factors, followed by total volatile organic compounds and carbon monoxide. Heart rate and heart rate variability were the most considered health indicators among all cardiopulmonary outcomes, followed by respiratory function. The studies mostly had a sample size of fewer than 100 participants and a study period of less than a week due to the challenges in accessing low-cost, small, and light wearable sensors. This review guides future sensor-based environmental health studies on project design and sensor selection.

Indexed as

Volatile Organic CompoundsWearable Electronic DevicesBiological FactorsCarbon MonoxideEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MonitoringHumansBiological FactorsCarbon MonoxideVolatile Organic Compoundsenvironmental monitoringhealth effecthuman subject studyportablesensorwearable

Identifiers

PMID36551098
PMCPMC9775571
OpenAlexW4311636676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.