Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36551067›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2022

Size-Based Sorting and In Situ Clonal Expansion of Single Cells Using Microfluidics.

Huaying Chen, Haixu Meng, Zhenlin Chen, Tong Wang, Chuanpin Chen, Yonggang Zhu, Jing Jin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Huaying ChenSchool of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzen, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Haixu MengSchool of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzen, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Zhenlin ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Kowloon, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Tong WangSchool of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzen, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Chuanpin ChenXiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, 172 Tongzipo Road, Changsha 410013, China.
Yonggang ZhuSchool of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzen, Shenzhen 518055, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5419-9508
Jing JinSchool of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzen, Shenzhen 518055, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7867-1224
Harbin Institute of Technology · CNCentral South University · CNCity University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32171400Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2020A1515010706Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2020A1515110901Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee GXWD20201230155427003-20200823111304001Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee JCYJ20180306172109024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Separation and clonal culture and growth kinetics analysis of target cells in a mixed population is critical for pathological research, disease diagnosis, and cell therapy. However, long-term culture with time-lapse imaging of the isolated cells for clonal analysis is still challenging. This paper reports a microfluidic device with four-level filtration channels and a pneumatic microvalve for size sorting and in situ clonal culture of single cells. The valve was on top of the filtration channels and used to direct fluid flow by membrane deformation during separation and long-term culture to avoid shear-induced cell deformation. Numerical simulations were performed to evaluate the influence of device parameters affecting the pressure drop across the filtration channels. Then, a droplet model was employed to evaluate the impact of cell viscosity, cell size, and channel width on the pressure drop inducing cell deformation. Experiments showed that filtration channels with a width of 7, 10, 13, or 17 μm successfully sorted K562 cells into four different size ranges at low driving pressure. The maximum efficiency of separating K562 cells from media and whole blood was 98.6% and 89.7%, respectively. Finally, the trapped single cells were cultured in situ for 4-7 days with time-lapse imaging to obtain the lineage trees and growth curves. Then, the time to the first division, variation of cell size before and after division, and cell fusion were investigated. This proved that cells at the G1 and G2 phases were of significantly distinct sizes. The microfluidic device for size sorting and clonal expansion will be of tremendous application potential in single-cell studies.

Indexed as

Microfluidic Analytical TechniquesMicrofluidicsFiltrationKineticsLab-On-A-Chip Devicesclonal expansionmicrofluidicsseparationsingle cellssizesorting

Identifiers

PMID36551067
PMCPMC9775143
OpenAlexW4311161385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.