ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2022
EEG Channel Selection Techniques in Motor Imagery Applications: A Review and New Perspectives.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- DO-PI-EATCNet: Efficient-Attention- and Dream-Optimization-Based Channel Selection for EEG Motor Imagery Classification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Neuroscience-Inspired Deep Learning Brain-Machine Interface Decoder.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Improving Individual-Specific SSVEP-BCI with Adaptive Channel and Subspace Selection in TRCA.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Extraction of brainprint by means of autoencoder with attention mechanism.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- Effect of EEG Electrode Numbers on Source Estimation in Motor Imagery.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Optimal Channel Selection of Multiclass Motor Imagery Classification Based on Fusion Convolutional Neural Network with Attention Blocks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Two-stage sparse multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for channel selection optimization in BCIs.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- State-of-the-Art on Brain-Computer Interface Technology.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Exploring the Role of Visual Guidance in Motor Imagery-Based Brain-Computer Interface: An EEG Microstate-Specific Functional Connectivity Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Multi-domain feature joint optimization based on multi-view learning for improving the EEG decoding.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- A learnable EEG channel selection method for MI-BCI using efficient channel attention.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Communication, neuro-prosthetics, and environmental control are just a few applications for disabled persons who use robots and manipulators that use brain-computer interface (BCI) systems. The brain's motor imagery (MI) signal is an essential input for a brain-related task in BCI applications. Due to their noninvasive, portability, and cost-effectiveness, electroencephalography (EEG) signals are the most widely used input in BCI systems. The EEG data are often collected from more than 100 different locations in the brain; channel selection techniques are critical for selecting the optimum channels for a given application. However, when analyzing EEG data, the principal purpose of channel selection is to reduce computational complexity, improve classification accuracy by avoiding overfitting, and reduce setup time. Several channel selection assessment algorithms, both with and without classification-based methods, extracted appropriate channel subsets using defined criteria. Therefore, based on the exhaustive analysis of the EEG channel selection, this manuscript analyses several existing studies to reduce the number of noisy channels and improve system performance. We review several existing works to find the most promising MI-based EEG channel selection algorithms and associated classification methodologies on various datasets. Moreover, we focus on channel selection methods that choose fewer channels with great precision. Finally, our main finding is that a smaller channel set, typically 10-30% of total channels, provided excellent performance compared to other existing studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.