Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36550697›Full record

Observational studyThe International journal of eating disorders2023

Development of a brief cognitive-behavioral treatment for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in the context of disorders of gut-brain interaction: Initial feasibility, acceptability, and clinical outcomes.

Helen Burton Murray, Imani Weeks, Kendra R Becker, Brjánn Ljótsson, Elizabeth N Madva, Kamryn T Eddy, Kyle Staller, Braden Kuo, Jennifer J Thomas

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The International journal of eating disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Avoidant-Restrictive Food Intake Disorder in Patients With Gastrointestinal Disorders: A Systematic Review.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder: Review and Recent Advances.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Helen Burton MurrayDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2059-3256
Imani WeeksCenter for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Kendra R BeckerDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8946-9977
Brjánn LjótssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Elizabeth N MadvaDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Kamryn T EddyDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1586-0930
Kyle StallerCenter for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Braden KuoCenter for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jennifer J ThomasDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2601-581X
Harvard University · USKarolinska Institutet · SEMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

New England Gastropareis Consortium: Neurobiology of GastroparesisU01DK112193 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Helen Burton Murray, Braden Kuo · 2016 to 2026
$4.8M
TRANSLUMBOSACRAL NEUROMODULATION THERAPY FOR FECAL INCONTINENCE: RANDOMIZED TRIALR01DK121003 · NIDDK · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI KUO, BRADEN, RAO, SATISH SC · 2019 to 2023
$2.6M
A Biobehavioral Approach to Understand Problematic Avoidant/Restrictive Eating in Adults with Functional DyspepsiaK23DK131334 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BURTON MURRAY, HELEN · 2021 to 2025
$1.1M
The Role of Negative Affect in the Cognitive-Behavioral Model of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder: An Integrated Analysis of Neural Circuitry, Hormones, and Momentary Negative EmotionsK23MH125143 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BECKER, KENDRA R · 2021 to 2025
$1.1M
The Role of Fiber in the Etiopathogenesis of Fecal IncontinenceK23DK120945 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI STALLER, KYLE · 2020 to 2024
$1.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK120945NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK131334NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK121003NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK112193NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH125143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAvoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) symptoms are common (up to 40%) among adults with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), but treatments for this population (DGBI + ARFID) have yet to be evaluated. We aimed to identify initial feasibility, acceptability, and clinical effects of an exposure-based cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) for adults with DGBI + ARFID.

methodsPatients (N = 14) received CBT as part of routine care in an outpatient gastroenterology clinic. A two-part investigation of the CBT included a retrospective evaluation of patients who were offered a flexible (8-10) session length and an observational prospective study of patients who were offered eight sessions. Feasibility benchmarks were ≥75% completion of sessions, quantitative measures (for treatment completers), and qualitative interviews. Acceptability was assessed with a benchmark of ≥70% patients reporting a posttreatment satisfaction scores ≥3 on 1-4 scale and with posttreatment qualitative interviews. Mixed model analysis explored signals of improvement in clinical outcomes.

resultsAll feasibility and acceptability benchmarks were achieved (and qualitative feedback revealed high satisfaction with the treatment and outcomes). There were improvements in clinical outcomes across treatment (all p's < .0001) with large effects for ARFID fear (-52%; Hedge's g = 1.5; 95% CI = 0.6, 2.5) and gastrointestinal-specific anxiety (-42%; Hedge's g = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.5, 16). Among those who needed to gain weight (n = 10), 94%-103% of expected weight gain goals were achieved. DISCUSSION: Initial development and testing of a brief 8-session CBT protocol for DGBI + ARFID showed high feasibility, acceptability, and promising clinical improvements. Findings will inform an NIH Stage 1B randomized control trial. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: While cognitive-behavioral treatments (CBTs) for ARFID have been created in outpatient feeding and eating disorder clinics, they have yet to be developed and refined for other clinic settings or populations. In line with the recommendations for behavioral treatment development, we conducted a two-part investigation of an exposure-based CBT for a patient population with high rates of ARFID-adults with disorders of gut-brain interaction (also known as functional gastrointestinal disorders). We found patients had high satisfaction with treatment and there were promising improvements for both gastrointestinal and ARFID outcomes. The refined treatment includes eight sessions delivered by a behavioral health care provider and the findings reported in this article will be studied next in an NIH Stage 1B randomized controlled trial.

Indexed as

Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake DisorderFeeding and Eating DisordersAdultBrainCognitionEatingFeasibility StudiesHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesARFIDavoidant/restrictive food intake disorderCBTcognitive-behavioral therapydisorders of gut-brain interactionfeasibilityfeeding and eating disordersfunctional dyspepsiafunctional gastrointestinal disorderspatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID36550697
PMCPMC9992156
OpenAlexW4312114761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.