Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36550520›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2022

Citizen engagement in healthcare procurement decision-making by healthcare insurers: recent experiences in the Netherlands.

Óscar Brito Fernandes, Véronique Bos, Niek Klazinga, Dionne Kringos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Barriers and Enablers of Value-Based Procurement in Dutch Healthcare Providers.International journal of health policy and management · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Óscar Brito FernandesDepartment of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8, Budapest, 1093, Hungary. o.r.britofernandes@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3212-373X
Véronique BosAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7447-9662
Niek KlazingaAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3937-8014
Dionne KringosAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2711-4713

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 765141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn insurance-based healthcare systems, healthcare insurers are interested in engaging citizens in care procurement to contract healthcare services that matter to people. In the Netherlands, an amendment to the Health Insurance Act was set forth in 2021 to formalize and strengthen the engagement of the insured population with healthcare insurers' procurement cycles. This study explores the role of Dutch healthcare insurers in operationalizing citizen engagement in procurement cycles before changes occur linked to the amendment to the Health Insurance Act.

methodsA phenomenological qualitative design was employed in two phases: (1) we consulted academics and policy experts on the role of healthcare insurers regarding citizen engagement; (2) we conducted focus groups with representatives of healthcare insurers to understand how citizens' engagement is being operationalized. Transcripts of the interviews with experts and detailed notes of focus group meetings were analysed using a qualitative inductive approach. Selected excerpts were analysed on discourse and content and organized by a coding scheme following a rigorous and accelerated data reduction technique.

resultsWe identified four strategies used by healthcare insurers to operationalize citizen engagement: (1) broadening their population health orientation; (2) developing and improving mechanisms for engaging citizens; (3) strengthening features of data governance for effective use of value-driven data; (4) implementing financial and incentive mechanisms among healthcare providers in support of value-based healthcare. However, regulated market mechanisms and low institutional trust in healthcare insurers undermine their transition from merely funding healthcare towards becoming people-centred value-based healthcare purchasers.

conclusionDutch healthcare insurers seem to be strengthening the community orientation of their functioning while enhancing the end-to-end experience of the insured. The expected practical effects of the amendment to the Health Insurance Act include broadening the role of the council of insurees in decision-making processes and systematically documenting the efforts set forth by healthcare insurers in engaging citizens. Further research is needed to better understand how the regulated competitive market could be hampering the engagement of citizens in healthcare procurement decision-making and value creation from the citizens' perspective.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareInsurance CarriersFocus GroupsHumansInsurance, HealthNetherlandsCitizen engagementManaged competitionPeople-centred healthcarePurchasingSocial health insuranceValue-based healthcare

Identifiers

PMID36550520
PMCPMC9773595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.