Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36550485›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022

LiSA: an assisted literature search pipeline for detecting serious adverse drug events with deep learning.

Vincent Martenot, Valentin Masdeu, Jean Cupe, Faustine Gehin, Margot Blanchon, Julien Dauriat, Alexander Horst, Michael Renaudin, Philippe Girard, Jean-Daniel Zucker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vincent MartenotQuinten, 8 rue Vernier, 75017, Paris, France. v.martenot@quinten-france.com.
Valentin MasdeuQuinten, 8 rue Vernier, 75017, Paris, France.
Jean CupeQuinten, 8 rue Vernier, 75017, Paris, France.
Faustine GehinQuinten, 8 rue Vernier, 75017, Paris, France.
Margot BlanchonQuinten, 8 rue Vernier, 75017, Paris, France.
Julien DauriatQuinten, 8 rue Vernier, 75017, Paris, France.
Alexander HorstSwiss Agency for Therapeutic Products, Swissmedic, Hallerstrasse 7, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Michael RenaudinSwiss Agency for Therapeutic Products, Swissmedic, Hallerstrasse 7, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Philippe GirardSwiss Agency for Therapeutic Products, Swissmedic, Hallerstrasse 7, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Jean-Daniel ZuckerUMMISCO, Sorbonne University, IRD, Bondy, France. Jean-Daniel.zucker@ird.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDetecting safety signals attributed to a drug in scientific literature is a fundamental issue in pharmacovigilance. The constant increase in the volume of publications requires the automation of this tedious task, in order to find and extract relevant articles from the pack. This task is critical, as serious Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) still account for a large number of hospital admissions each year.

objectivesThe aim of this study is to develop an augmented intelligence methodology for automatically identifying relevant publications mentioning an established link between a Drug and a Serious Adverse Event, according to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) definition of seriousness.

methodsThe proposed pipeline, called LiSA (for Literature Search Application), is based on three independent deep learning models supporting a precise detection of safety signals in the biomedical literature. By combining a Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) algorithms and a modular architecture, the pipeline achieves a precision of 0.81 and a recall of 0.89 at sentences level in articles extracted from PubMed (either abstract or full-text). We also measured that by using LiSA, a medical reviewer increases by a factor of 2.5 the number of relevant documents it can collect and evaluate compared to a simple keyword search. In the interest of re-usability, emphasis was placed on building a modular pipeline allowing the insertion of other NLP modules to enrich the results provided by the system, and extend it to other use cases. In addition, a lightweight visualization tool was developed to analyze and monitor safety signal results.

conclusionsOverall, the generic pipeline and the visualization tool proposed in this article allows for efficient and accurate monitoring of serious adverse drug reactions from the literature and can easily be adapted to similar pharmacovigilance use cases. To facilitate reproducibility and benefit other research studies, we also shared a first benchmark dataset for Serious Adverse Drug Events detection.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAlgorithmsHumansReproducibility of ResultsAdverse drug eventsAssisted literature reviewDeep LearningNLP

Identifiers

PMID36550485
PMCPMC9773506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.