Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36550465›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Validation of the Indonesian resilience evaluation scale in an undergraduate student population.

Indira Primasari, Chris M Hoeboer, Anne Bakker, Miranda Olff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Indira PrimasariAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Psychiatry, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. i.d.primasari@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-4255-0580
Chris M HoeboerAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Psychiatry, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5991-1963
Anne BakkerAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Psychiatry, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3248-2441
Miranda OlffAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Psychiatry, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1016-9515
GGD Amsterdam · NLArq Psychotrauma Expert Group · NLUniversitas Prima Indonesia · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychological resilience is an important factor in coping with Potentially Traumatic Events (PTEs) and might mitigate the development of trauma-related disorders. Due to the high risk of natural disasters, criminal activity, and transportation accidents among the Indonesian population, it is critical to assess psychological resilience as a protective factor. This study aimed to validate the Resilience Evaluation Scale (RES) in Indonesian undergraduate students.

methodsWe recruited 327 students (78% female, the mean age is 19.61 (SD = 1.24)) between March and June 2020 using convenience sampling, 256 (78.28%) of whom completed the RES twice with an interval of 2 weeks for test-retest reliability purposes. Parallel Analysis and Exploratory Factor Analysis were performed to examine the construct validity of the RES. The internal consistency and the test-retest reliability were assessed using Cronbach Alpha, Pearson Correlations, and Interclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC). Convergent and divergent validity were examined using Pearson Correlations.

resultsEFA analysis yielded a two-factor structure for the final eight-item Indonesian version of RES, which reflected two underlying constructs of resilience: self-confidence and self-efficacy. The Indonesian version of RES demonstrated good internal consistency (α = 0.74-0.82) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.68-0.78; ICC = 0.67-0.78). The result showed that the RES total and subscale scores positively correlated with all criterion variables (resilience, self-efficacy, self-esteem, level of global functioning, and adaptive coping strategy; r = 0.27-0.73). RES total and subscale scores negatively correlated with opposite constructs (PTSD, depression, social/work impairment, and maladaptive coping strategy; r = - 0.27- -0.46).

conclusionsThe current study showed that the Indonesian RES is a valid and reliable measurement of psychological resilience in Indonesian undergraduate students. The final 8-item Indonesian RES, a freely available resilience instrument, is recommended for future studies and public mental health initiatives in the Indonesian population.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalResilience, PsychologicalFemaleHumansIndonesiaMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesAssessmentResilienceUndergraduate studentsValidation study

Identifiers

PMID36550465
PMCPMC9783966
OpenAlexW4312190912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.