Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36550443›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

Biomechanical comparison of spinal column shortening - a finite element study.

Jincheng Wu, Ye Han, Hanpeng Xu, Dongmei Yang, Wangqiang Wen, Haoxiang Xu, Jun Miao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jincheng Wu *Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Jiefangnanlu 406, Hexi District, Tianjin, China.
Ye Han *The Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding City, Hebei, China.
Hanpeng Xu *Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Jiefangnanlu 406, Hexi District, Tianjin, China.
Dongmei YangSouthern Medical University, Guangzhou City, China.
Wangqiang WenThe First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou City, Hainan, China.
Haoxiang XuThe Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Jun MiaoDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Jiefangnanlu 406, Hexi District, Tianjin, China. mj6688@163.com.
Tianjin University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Hebei University · CNHainan Medical University · CNSouthern Medical University · CNThird People's Hospital of Hefei · CNTianjin Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81472140Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City S20ZDD484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt present, research on spinal shortening is mainly focused on the safe distance of spinal shortening and the mechanism of spinal cord injury, but there is no research on the biomechanical characteristics of different shortening distances. The purpose of this study was to study the biomechanical characteristics of spine and internal fixation instruments at different shortening distances by the finite element (FE) method.

methodsAn FE model of lumbar L1-S was established and referred to the previous in vitro experiments to verify the rationality of the model by verifying the Intradiscal pressure (IDP) and the range of motion (ROM) of the motion segment. Five element models of spinal shortening were designed under the safe distance of spinal shortening, and the entire L3 vertebra and both the upper and lower intervertebral discs were resected. Model A was not shortened, while models B-E were shortened by 10%, 20%, 30% and 50% of the vertebral body, respectively. Constraining the ROM of the sacrum in all directions, a 7.5 N ·m moment and 280 N follower load were applied on the L1 vertebra to simulate the motion of the lumbar vertebrae in three planes. The ROM of the operated segments, the Von Mises stress (VMS) of the screw-rod system, the VMS of the upper endplate at the interface between the titanium cage and the L4 vertebral body, and the ROM and the IDP of the adjacent segment (L5/S) were recorded and analysed.

resultsAll surgical models showed good stability at the operated segments (L1-5), with the greatest constraint in posterior extension (99.3-99.7%), followed by left-right bending (97.9-98.7%), and the least constraint in left-right rotation (84.9-86.3%) compared with the intact model. The VMS of the screw-rod system and the ROM and IDP of the distal adjacent segments of models A-E showed an increasing trend, in which the VMS of the screw-rod system of model E was the highest under flexion (172.5 MPa). The VMS of the endplate at the interface between the cage and L4 upper endplate of models A-E decreased gradually, and these trend were the most obvious in flexion, which were 3.03, 2.95, 2.83, 2.78, and 2.61 times that of the intact model, respectively.

conclusionWhen performing total vertebrae resection and correcting the spinal deformity, if the corrected spine has met our needs, the distance of spinal shortening should be minimized to prevent spinal cord injury, fracture of internal fixations and adjacent segment disease (ASD).

Indexed as

Pedicle ScrewsSpinal FusionBiomechanical PhenomenaBone ScrewsFinite Element AnalysisHumansLumbar VertebraeRange of Motion, ArticularFinite element analysisSpinal cord injurySpinal shorteningTotal en bloc spondylectomy (TES)

Identifiers

PMID36550443
PMCPMC9783724
OpenAlexW4312179173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.