Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36550434›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Messaging preferences among Florida caregivers participating in focus groups who had not yet accepted the HPV vaccine for their 11- to 12-year-old child.

Stephanie A S Staras, Carma L Bylund, Michaela D Mullis, Lindsay A Thompson, Jaclyn M Hall, Marta D Hansen, Carla L Fisher

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie A S StarasDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA. sstaras@ufl.edu.
Carma L BylundDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Michaela D MullisDepartment of Advertising, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, 2096 Weimer Hall 1885 Stadium Rd, PO BOX 118400, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Lindsay A ThompsonDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Jaclyn M HallDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Marta D HansenDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Carla L FisherDepartment of Advertising, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, 2096 Weimer Hall 1885 Stadium Rd, PO BOX 118400, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
University of Florida · USFlorida College · US

Funding

Text and Talk: A multi-level intervention to increase provider HPV vaccine recommendation effectivenessR37CA234030 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI STARAS, STEPHANIE A S · 2019 to 2025
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA234030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the United States, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates remain low. The President's Cancer Panel suggests that effective messaging about the HPV vaccination focus on the vaccine's safety, efficacy, ability to prevent cancer, and recommendation at ages 11- to 12-years. We aimed to develop messages about HPV vaccine that include the President Cancer Panel's suggestions and were acceptable to caregivers of adolescents.

methodsFrom August to October 2020, we conducted one-hour, Zoom videoconference focus groups with caregivers who lived in Florida, had an 11- to 12-year-old child, and had not had any of their children receive the HPV vaccine. Focus group moderators asked caregivers to react to three videos of clinician (i.e., MD, DO, APRN, PA) recommendations and three text message reminders. Thematic analysis was conducted using the constant comparative method and led by one author with qualitative analysis expertise. Two additional authors validated findings.

resultsCaregivers (n = 25 in six groups) were primarily non-Hispanic white (84%) and educated (64% had at least an Associate's degree). Approximately a third of caregivers had delayed (44%) or decided against a vaccine for their child (36%). Caregivers described six preferred message approaches: recognize caregivers' autonomy, balanced benefits and risks, trustworthy sources, increased feasibility of appointment scheduling, information prior to decision point, and preferred personalized information. Caregivers expressed a desire to have the follow-up doses mentioned in the introduction.

conclusionsHPV vaccine messages, whether delivered by a clinician or via text message, will be more acceptable to caregivers if they approach HPV vaccination as the caregivers' decision, and include information from trusted sources to help caregivers make an informed choice.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesAdolescentCaregiversChildFloridaFocus GroupsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansUnited StatesVaccinationPapillomavirus Vaccinesadolescentsclinician recommendationsHPV vaccinationremindersVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36550434
PMCPMC9779937
OpenAlexW4312190633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.