Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36550411›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022

Symptoms are known by their companies: towards association guided disease diagnosis assistant.

Abhisek Tiwari, Tulika Saha, Sriparna Saha, Pushpak Bhattacharyya, Shemim Begum, Minakshi Dhar, Sarbajeet Tiwari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Abhisek TiwariDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Patna, Patna, India. abhisek_1921cs16@iitp.ac.in.
Tulika SahaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England, United Kingdom.
Sriparna SahaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Patna, Patna, India.
Pushpak BhattacharyyaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Shemim BegumDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Government College of Engineering and Textile Technology, Berhampore, Berhampore, India.
Minakshi DharDepartment of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, India.
Sarbajeet TiwariDepartment of Medicine, Midnapore Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Midnapore, India.
Indian Institute of Technology Patna · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences RishikeshBerhampur University · INIndian Institute of Technology Bombay · INUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last few years, dozens of healthcare surveys have shown a shortage of doctors and an alarming doctor-population ratio. With the motivation of assisting doctors and utilizing their time efficiently, automatic disease diagnosis using artificial intelligence is experiencing an ever-growing demand and popularity. Humans are known by the company they keep; similarly, symptoms also exhibit the association property, i.e., one symptom may strongly suggest another symptom's existence/non-existence, and their association provides crucial information about the suffering condition. The work investigates the role of symptom association in symptom investigation and disease diagnosis process. We propose and build a virtual assistant called Association guided Symptom Investigation and Diagnosis Assistant (A-SIDA) using hierarchical reinforcement learning. The proposed A-SIDDA converses with patients and extracts signs and symptoms as per patients' chief complaints and ongoing dialogue context. We infused association-based recommendations and critic into the assistant, which reinforces the assistant for conducting context-aware, symptom-association guided symptom investigation. Following the symptom investigation, the assistant diagnoses a disease based on the extracted signs and symptoms. The assistant then diagnoses a disease based on the extracted signs and symptoms. In addition to diagnosis accuracy, the relevance of inspected symptoms is critical to the usefulness of a diagnosis framework. We also propose a novel evaluation metric called Investigation Relevance Score (IReS), which measures the relevance of symptoms inspected during symptom investigation. The obtained improvements (Diagnosis success rate-5.36%, Dialogue length-1.16, Match rate-2.19%, Disease classifier-6.36%, IReS-0.3501, and Human score-0.66) over state-of-the-art methods firmly establish the crucial role of symptom association that gets uncovered by the virtual agent. Furthermore, we found that the association guided symptom investigation greatly increases human satisfaction, owing to its seamless topic (symptom) transition.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningHumansDeep reinforcement learningDisease diagnosis assistantEarly diagnosisSymptom associationSymptom investigationTask oriented dialogue system

Identifiers

PMID36550411
PMCPMC9773525
OpenAlexW4312190308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.