Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36550290›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2023

The role of the lateral orbitofrontal cortex in creating cognitive maps.

Kauê Machado Costa, Robert Scholz, Kevin Lloyd, Perla Moreno-Castilla, Matthew P H Gardner, Peter Dayan, Geoffrey Schoenbaum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The reward positivity is insensitive to reinforcer devaluation.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Predictive encoding of auditory sequences in the human prefrontal cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  19. The orbitofrontal cortex updates beliefs for state inference.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kauê Machado CostaNational Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. kaue.m.costa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5562-6495
Robert ScholzMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
Kevin LloydMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
Perla Moreno-CastillaNational Institute on Aging Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Matthew P H GardnerConcordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9146-5043
Peter DayanMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3476-1839
Geoffrey SchoenbaumNational Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. geoffrey.schoenbaum@nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8180-0701

Funding

Associative learning, decision-making, and addictionZIADA000587 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI SCHOENBAUM, GEOFFREY · 2012 to 2025
$47.7M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DA000587U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) da000587
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We use mental models of the world-cognitive maps-to guide behavior. The lateral orbitofrontal cortex (lOFC) is typically thought to support behavior by deploying these maps to simulate outcomes, but recent evidence suggests that it may instead support behavior by underlying map creation. We tested between these two alternatives using outcome-specific devaluation and a high-potency chemogenetic approach. Selectively inactivating lOFC principal neurons when male rats learned distinct cue-outcome associations, but before outcome devaluation, disrupted subsequent inference, confirming a role for the lOFC in creating new maps. However, lOFC inactivation surprisingly led to generalized devaluation, a result that is inconsistent with a complete mapping failure. Using a reinforcement learning framework, we show that this effect is best explained by a circumscribed deficit in credit assignment precision during map construction, suggesting that the lOFC has a selective role in defining the specificity of associations that comprise cognitive maps.

Indexed as

LearningPrefrontal CortexAnimalsChoice BehaviorCognitionMaleRatsReinforcement, Psychology

Identifiers

PMID36550290
PMCPMC9839657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.