Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36550141›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Prestimulus oscillatory brain activity interacts with evoked recurrent processing to facilitate conscious visual perception.

Kristina Krasich, Claire Simmons, Kevin O'Neill, Charles M Giattino, Felipe De Brigard, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Liad Mudrik, Marty G Woldorff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Research on the relationship between resting-state spontaneous electroencephalography and task-evoked electroencephalography].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Current of Consciousness: Neural Correlates and Clinical Aspects.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kristina KrasichCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA. kristina.krasich@duke.edu.
Claire SimmonsCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Kevin O'NeillCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Charles M GiattinoOur World in Data, Oxford Martin Programme on Global Development, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3BD, UK.
Felipe De BrigardCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Walter Sinnott-ArmstrongCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Liad MudrikSchool of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, 69978, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Marty G WoldorffCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Duke University · USTel Aviv University · ILUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated whether prestimulus alpha-band oscillatory activity and stimulus-elicited recurrent processing interact to facilitate conscious visual perception. Participants tried to perceive a visual stimulus that was perceptually masked through object substitution masking (OSM). We showed that attenuated prestimulus alpha power was associated with greater negative-polarity stimulus-evoked ERP activity that resembled the visual awareness negativity (VAN), previously argued to reflect recurrent processing related to conscious perception. This effect, however, was not associated with better perception. Instead, when prestimulus alpha power was elevated, a preferred prestimulus alpha phase was associated with a greater VAN-like negativity, which was then associated with better cue perception. Cue perception was worse when prestimulus alpha power was elevated but the stimulus occurred at a nonoptimal prestimulus alpha phase and the VAN-like negativity was low. Our findings suggest that prestimulus alpha activity at a specific phase enables temporally selective recurrent processing that facilitates conscious perception in OSM.

Indexed as

ConsciousnessVisual PerceptionAlpha RhythmBrainElectroencephalographyHumansPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36550141
PMCPMC9780344
OpenAlexW4312192939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.