Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36549873›Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2022

Digital solution for detection of undiagnosed diabetes using machine learning-based retinal image analysis.

Benny Zee, Jack Lee, Maria Lai, Peter Chee, James Rafferty, Rebecca Thomas, David Owens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Diabetes management in the era of artificial intelligence.Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Benny ZeeCentre for Clinical Research and Biostatistics, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China bzee@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID 0000-0002-7238-845X
Jack LeeCentre for Clinical Research and Biostatistics, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Maria LaiCentre for Clinical Research and Biostatistics, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Peter CheeSt. John Hospital, Hospital Authority of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
James RaffertyCentre for Biomathematics, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK.
Rebecca ThomasBiomedical Science, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK.
David OwensBiomedical Science, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKSwansea University · GBHospital Authority · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUndiagnosed diabetes is a global health issue. Previous studies have estimated that about 24.1%-75.1% of all diabetes cases are undiagnosed, leading to more diabetic complications and inducing huge healthcare costs. Many current methods for diabetes diagnosis rely on metabolic indices and are subject to considerable variability. In contrast, a digital approach based on retinal image represents a stable marker of overall glycemic status. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsOur study involves 2221 subjects for developing a classification model, with 945 subjects with diabetes and 1276 controls. The training data included 70% and the testing data 30% of the subjects. All subjects had their retinal images taken using a non-mydriatic fundus camera. Two separate data sets were used for external validation. The Hong Kong testing data contain 734 controls without diabetes and 660 subjects with diabetes, and the UK testing data have 1682 subjects with diabetes.

resultsThe 10-fold cross-validation using the support vector machine approach has a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 96.2%. The separate testing data from Hong Kong provided a sensitivity of 99.5% and a specificity of 91.1%. For the UK testing data, the sensitivity is 98.0%. The accuracy of the Caucasian retinal images is comparable with that of the Asian data. It implies that the digital method can be applied globally. Those with diabetes complications in both Hong Kong and UK data have a higher probability of risk of diabetes compared with diabetes subjects without complications.

conclusionsA digital machine learning-based method to estimate the risk of diabetes based on retinal images has been developed and validated using both Asian and Caucasian data. Retinal image analysis is a fast, convenient, and non-invasive technique for community health applications. In addition, it is an ideal solution for undiagnosed diabetes prescreening.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyFluorescein AngiographyHumansMachine LearningRetinaprediabetic stateprimary health carepublic healthretina

Identifiers

PMID36549873
PMCPMC9809219
OpenAlexW4312191241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.