ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2023
WEB Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Long-Term Follow-up of a Single-Center Cohort of 100 Patients.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Aneurysmal recurrence and retreatment modalities after Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device in ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis.Neuroradiology · 2025Pooled it
- Retreatment rate and strategies for recurrent and residual aneurysms after Woven EndoBridge (WEB) treatment: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Woven Endobridge device for ruptured vs. unruptured aneurysms: insights from the WorldWideWEB study.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Microsurgical clipping of a recurrent anterior communicating artery aneurysm following WEB intrasaccular embolization: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025Article
- Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge- safety and efficacy.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Comparison of Angiographic Outcomes of Woven EndoBridge and Balloon-Assisted Coiling for the Treatment of Ruptured Wide-Necked Aneurysms: A Multicentric Study.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Clinical management of a ruptured intracranial aneurysm.Frontiers in stroke · 2024Review
- Microsurgical clipping as a retreatment strategy for previously ruptured aneurysms treated with the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device: a mono-institutional case series.Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe Woven EndoBridge device (WEB) was introduced for the intrasaccular treatment of wide-neck aneurysms without the need for adjunctive devices. We used the WEB as a primary treatment for 100 ruptured aneurysms regardless of neck size or location. In this study, we present the long-term follow-up of 78 surviving patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsBetween February 2015 and April 2017, one hundred ruptured aneurysms were treated with the WEB. For surviving patients, angiographic and clinical follow-up was scheduled at 3 months, and 3T MRA and clinical follow-up, at 6, 12, 36, and 60 months. Of 100 patients, 18 died during hospital admission, and in 4, the ruptured aneurysm was additionally treated. The remaining 78 patients had a mean follow-up of 51 months (median, 52 months; range, 5-84 months). There were 57 women and 21 men, with a mean age of 58.5 years (median, 59 years; range, 24-80 years). Of 78 aneurysms with long-term follow-up, 52 (66%) had a wide neck.
resultsOf 78 ruptured aneurysms, 56 (72%) remained completely occluded and 17 (22%) had a stable small neck remnant. Five of 78 aneurysms (6%; 95% CI, 2.4%-14.5%) reopened during follow-up and were additionally treated. There were no rebleeds during follow-up.
conclusionsTreatment of ruptured aneurysms with the WEB was safe and effective and has long-term results comparable with those of simple coiling of small-neck aneurysms. The WEB proved to be a valuable alternative to coils for both wide- and small-neck ruptured aneurysms without the need for stents, balloons, or antiplatelet therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.