Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36549758›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2022

Invasive management of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in a patient with severe thrombocytopenia secondary to adult-onset immune thrombocytopenic purpura.

Muhammad Usman Shah, Asif Muhammad, Benjamin Davison, Syed Yaseen Naqvi

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Muhammad Usman ShahDepartment of Cardiology, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK usmanshah44@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5034-064X
Asif MuhammadDepartment of Cardiology, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK.
Benjamin DavisonDepartment of Cardiology, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5015-832X
Syed Yaseen NaqviDepartment of Cardiology, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK.
Castle Hill Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managing patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) and thrombocytopenia is challenging when they present with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). They are at high risk of thrombotic events; however, antiplatelet medications may further lower the platelet count and predispose them to significant bleeding events, especially if undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We present a case of a man in his 70s, previously diagnosed with adult-onset ITP, admitted with ACS and severe thrombocytopenia. He was treated with a single antiplatelet and commenced on high-dose steroids. Once platelet levels had improved, he was started on second antiplatelet and underwent successful PCI with drug-eluting stent. He was safely discharged with dual antiplatelets for 1 month and then lifelong clopidogrel without any immediate complications. Our case shows that such patients, if stable, can be safely and successfully treated with steroids to improve platelet count before proceeding to invasive management and dual antiplatelet medications.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeDrug-Eluting StentsNon-ST Elevated Myocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPurpura, Thrombocytopenic, IdiopathicAdultHumansMalePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsInterventional cardiologyIschaemic heart disease

Identifiers

PMID36549758
PMCPMC9791383
OpenAlexW4312191074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.