Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36549721›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Comanagement with rheumatology and prescription biologics filled during pregnancy in women with rheumatic diseases: a retrospective analysis of US administrative claims data.

Divya Shridharmurthy, Kate L Lapane, Jonggyu Baek, Anthony Nunes, Jonathan Kay, Shao-Hsien Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Divya ShridharmurthyDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Kate L LapaneDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Jonggyu BaekDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9199-798X
Anthony NunesDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Jonathan KayDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Shao-Hsien LiuDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA shaohsien.liu@umassmed.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4317-4986
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate comanagement with rheumatology and biological prescriptions filled during pregnancy among women with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and to examine factors associated with receiving comanagement with rheumatology during pregnancy.

designA retrospective analysis of US claims data.

settingCommercially insured enrollees using data from the 2013-2018 IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database.

participantsWe identified 4131 pregnant women aged ≤55 years from the 2013-2018 IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database with an International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision/10th Revision codes for RA, axSpA or PsA, with continuous enrolment at ≥3 months before the date of the last menstrual period (LMP) (index date) and throughout pregnancy. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Filled biologics (prescriptions and infusions) claims were categorised by 90 days before the LMP and trimester, as were primary care, obstetrician and rheumatological claims.

resultsThe prevalence of axSpA, RA and PsA was 0.7%, 0.2% and 0.04% among reproductive age women. The average maternal age was 32.7 years (SD 5.7). During pregnancy, 9.1% of those with axSpA (n=2,410) and 56.4% of those with RA/PsA (n=1,721) had a rheumatological claim. Biologics claims were less common among those with axSpA (90 days before LMP: 1.6%, during pregnancy: 1.1%) than those with RA/PsA (90 days before LMP: 11.9%, during pregnancy: 6.9%). Medications during pregnancy included corticosteroids (axSpA: 0.3%, RA/PsA: 2.2%), non-biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (axSpA: 0.2%, RA/PsA: 1.7%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (axSpA: 0.2%, RA/PsA: 1.3%) and opioids (axSpA: 0.2%, RA/PsA: 0.6%). Established rheumatological care and biologics claims during the 90 days before LMP showed good prediction accuracy for receiving comanagement with rheumatology during pregnancy (axSpA: area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) 0.73, RA/PsA: AUC 0.70).

conclusionComanagement with rheumatology during pregnancy occurs infrequently, especially for women with axSpA. Biologics claims during pregnancy may not align with published guidelines. Future research is warranted to improve comanagement with rheumatology during pregnancy.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, PsoriaticArthritis, RheumatoidRheumatologyFemaleHumansPregnancyRetrospective StudiesAntirheumatic AgentsEPIDEMIOLOGYHEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENTRHEUMATOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID36549721
PMCPMC9791456
OpenAlexW4312191106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.