Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36549378›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2023

Computational models of subjective feelings in psychiatry.

Chang-Hao Kao, Gloria W Feng, Jihyun K Hur, Huw Jarvis, Robb B Rutledge

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neuroscience Needs Behavioral "Wind Tunnels" for Real-Life Translation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Social Decision Preferences for Close Others Are Embedded in Neural and Linguistic Representations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Language sentiment predicts changes in depressive symptoms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chang-Hao KaoDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. Electronic address: chang-hao.kao@yale.edu.
Gloria W FengDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Jihyun K HurDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Huw JarvisDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Robb B RutledgeDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: robb.rutledge@yale.edu.
Yale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Remote computational phenotyping of behavioral and affective dynamics in major depressionR01MH124110 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI RUTLEDGE, ROBB BROOKS · 2020 to 2024
$4.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH124110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research in computational psychiatry is dominated by models of behavior. Subjective experience during behavioral tasks is not well understood, even though it should be relevant to understanding the symptoms of psychiatric disorders. Here, we bridge this gap and review recent progress in computational models for subjective feelings. For example, happiness reflects not how well people are doing, but whether they are doing better than expected. This dependence on recent reward prediction errors is intact in major depression, although depressive symptoms lower happiness during tasks. Uncertainty predicts subjective feelings of stress in volatile environments. Social prediction errors influence feelings of self-worth more in individuals with low self-esteem despite a reduced willingness to change beliefs due to social feedback. Measuring affective state during behavioral tasks provides a tool for understanding psychiatric symptoms that can be dissociable from behavior. When smartphone tasks are collected longitudinally, subjective feelings provide a potential means to bridge the gap between lab-based behavioral tasks and real-life behavior, emotion, and psychiatric symptoms.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderPsychiatryComputer SimulationEmotionsHumansComputational modelComputational psychiatryDecision makingDepressionHappinessReward prediction errorsSmartphoneSubjective feelings

Identifiers

PMID36549378
PMCPMC9990828
OpenAlexW4312052229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.