ArticleMedical image analysis2023
Robust endoscopic image mosaicking via fusion of multimodal estimation.
Article in Medical image analysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Probabilistic Camera Distortion Correction Using Deep Gaussian Processes.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- CSAFusion: a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based and Swin Transformer network for multi-modal medical image fusion.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- A Serious Game to Study Reduced Field of View in Keyhole Surgery: Development and Experimental Study.JMIR serious games · 2025Article
- Autonomous Magnetic Navigation in Endoscopic Image Mosaics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- A Non-Conventional Review on Multi-Modality-Based Medical Image Fusion.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We propose an endoscopic image mosaicking algorithm that is robust to light conditioning changes, specular reflections, and feature-less scenes. These conditions are especially common in minimally invasive surgery where the light source moves with the camera to dynamically illuminate close range scenes. This makes it difficult for a single image registration method to robustly track camera motion and then generate consistent mosaics of the expanded surgical scene across different and heterogeneous environments. Instead of relying on one specialised feature extractor or image registration method, we propose to fuse different image registration algorithms according to their uncertainties, formulating the problem as affine pose graph optimisation. This allows to combine landmarks, dense intensity registration, and learning-based approaches in a single framework. To demonstrate our application we consider deep learning-based optical flow, hand-crafted features, and intensity-based registration, however, the framework is general and could take as input other sources of motion estimation, including other sensor modalities. We validate the performance of our approach on three datasets with very different characteristics to highlighting its generalisability, demonstrating the advantages of our proposed fusion framework. While each individual registration algorithm eventually fails drastically on certain surgical scenes, the fusion approach flexibly determines which algorithms to use and in which proportion to more robustly obtain consistent mosaics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.