Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36548674›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and infectious disease2022

Main Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake among Italian Healthcare Workers in Relation to Variable Degrees of Hesitancy: Result from a Cross-Sectional Online Survey.

Marco Trabucco Aurilio, Francesco Saverio Mennini, Cristiana Ferrari, Giuseppina Somma, Luca Di Giampaolo, Matteo Bolcato, Fabio De-Giorgio, Roberto Muscatello, Andrea Magrini, Luca Coppeta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marco Trabucco AurilioDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "V.Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2327-1455
Francesco Saverio MenniniEconomic Evaluation and HTA (EEHTA CEIS), Department of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Economics, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Columbia 2, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4738-5505
Cristiana FerrariDepartment of Occupational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2292-3338
Giuseppina SommaDepartment of Occupational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.
Luca Di GiampaoloDepartment of Medicine and Science of Ageing, Specialization School of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, G. D'Annunzio University Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Matteo BolcatoDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Padua, 35121 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8784-8463
Fabio De-GiorgioDepartment of Healthcare Surveillance and Bioethics, Section of Legal Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Roberto MuscatelloOffice of Medical Forensic Coordination, Italian National Social Security Institute (INPS), 00144 Rome, Italy.
Andrea MagriniDepartment of Occupational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.
Luca CoppetaDepartment of Occupational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2470-6107

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hesitancy remains one of the major hurdles to vaccination, regardless of the fact that vaccines are indisputable preventive measures against many infectious diseases. Nevertheless, vaccine hesitancy or refusal is a growing phenomenon in the general population as well as among healthcare workers (HCWs). Many different factors can contribute to hesitancy to COVID-19 vaccination in the HCWs population, including socio-demographic characteristics (female gender, low socio-economical status, lower age), individual beliefs regarding vaccine efficacy and safety, as well as other factors (occupation, knowledge about COVID-19, etc.). Understanding the determinants of accepting or refusing the COVID-19 vaccination is crucial to plan specific interventions in order to increase the rate of vaccine coverage among health care workers. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey on HCWs in seventeen Italian regions, between 30 June and 4 July 2021, in order to collect information about potential factors related to vaccine acceptance and hesitancy. Results: We found an overall vaccine uptake rate of 96.4% in our sample. Acceptance was significantly related to job task, with physicians showing the highest rate of uptake compared to other occupations. At univariate analysis, the HCWs population’s vaccine hesitancy was significantly positively associated with fear of vaccination side effects (p < 0.01), and negatively related to confidence in the safety and efficacy of the vaccine (p < 0.01). Through multivariate analysis, we found that only the fear of possible vaccination side effects (OR: 4.631, p < 0.01) and the confidence in vaccine safety and effectiveness (OR: 0.35 p < 0.05) remained significantly associated with hesitancy. Conclusion: Action to improve operator confidence in the efficacy and safety of the vaccine should improve the acceptance rate among operators.

Indexed as

COVID-19 vaccinehealthcare workersvaccine confidencevaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36548674
PMCPMC9780995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.