ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2022
Automatic Exposure Control Attains Radiation Dose Modulation Matched with the Head Size in Pediatric Brain CT.
Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serum S100B Level in the Management of Pediatric Minor Head Trauma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Estimation of organ and effective doses in High-Resolution Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (HR-CBCT) during cerebral angiography.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- The impact of arm position on image quality and radiation dose in pediatric toddler chest computed tomography: a phantom and clinical study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Noise Reduction in Brain CT: A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction Using Multiple Parameters.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
- Body physical parameters instead of water equivalent diameter to calculate size-specific dose estimate in adult chest CT.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Cranial Computer Tomography with Photon Counting and Energy-Integrated Detectors: Objective Comparison in the Same Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Age-Dependent Changes in Effective Dose in Pediatric Brain CT: Comparisons of Estimation Methods.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Article
- Image Quality and Radiation Dose of Conventional and Wide-Field High-Resolution Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Cerebral Angiography: A Phantom Study.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Article
- Relationships of Radiation Dose Indices with Body Size Indices in Adult Body Computed Tomography.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Article
- Radiation Dose Management in Computed Tomography: Introduction to the Practice at a Single Facility.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Article
- Optimizing Chest Computed Tomography Imaging Protocols: A Narrative Review on Dose Reduction and Diagnostic Efficacy.Journal of medical physicsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated the relationship between the head size and radiation dose in pediatric brain computed tomography (CT) to evaluate the validity of automatic exposure control (AEC). Phantom experiments were performed to assess image noise with and without AEC, and indicated that AEC decreased differences in noise between slices of different section sizes. Retrospective analysis was conducted on 980 pediatric brain CT scans where the tube current was determined using AEC. The water equivalent diameter (WED) was employed as an index of the head size, and mean WED for each image set (WEDmean) and WED for each slice (WEDslice) were used for analysis. For the image-set-based analysis, volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) was compared to WEDmean. For the slice-based analysis, the tube current was compared to WEDslice using 20 of the 980 sets. Additionally, CTDIvol and WEDmean were compared between male and female patients matched for age, weight, or WEDmean. CTDIvol increased with increasing WEDmean, and an exponential curve was closely fitted to the relationship. Tube current changed similarly to the change in WEDslice for each image set, and an exponential curve was well-fitted to the plots of tube current against WEDslice when data from the 20 sets were pooled together. Although CTDIvol and WEDmean were slightly but significantly larger for male than female patients after matching for age or weight, a sex-dependent difference in CTDIvol was not found after matching for WEDmean. This study indicated successful dose modulation using AEC according to the head size for each patient and each slice location. The application of AEC to pediatric brain CT is recommended for radiation dose optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.