ReviewTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2022
A Review of Computer-Aided Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using Sequential Mammograms.
Review in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Diagnostic Value of Image-Based Machine Learning for Osteoporosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Subtraction of Temporally Sequential Digital Mammograms: Prediction and Localization of Near-Term Breast Cancer Occurrence.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Application of CAD Systems in Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using Machine Learning Techniques: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Subtraction of Temporally Sequential Digital Mammograms: Enhancing the Detection and Classification of Malignant Masses in Breast Imaging.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- Predicting HER2 Status Associated with Breast Cancer Aggressiveness Using Four Machine Learning Models.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
- An Artificial Intelligence-Based Tool for Enhancing Pectoral Muscle Segmentation in Mammograms: Addressing Class Imbalance and Validation Challenges in Automated Breast Cancer Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Deep learning approaches for breast cancer detection in histopathology images: A review.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiologists assess the results of mammography, the key screening tool for the detection of breast cancer, to determine the presence of malignancy. They, routinely, compare recent and prior mammographic views to identify changes between the screenings. In case a new lesion appears in a mammogram, or a region is changing rapidly, it is more likely to be suspicious, compared to a lesion that remains unchanged and it is usually benign. However, visual evaluation of mammograms is challenging even for expert radiologists. For this reason, various Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) algorithms are being developed to assist in the diagnosis of abnormal breast findings using mammograms. Most of the current CAD systems do so using only the most recent mammogram. This paper provides a review of the development of methods to emulate the radiological approach and perform automatic segmentation and/or classification of breast abnormalities using sequential mammogram pairs. It begins with demonstrating the importance of utilizing prior views in mammography, through the review of studies where the performance of expert and less-trained radiologists was compared. Following, image registration techniques and their application to mammography are presented. Subsequently, studies that implemented temporal analysis or subtraction of temporally sequential mammograms are summarized. Finally, a description of the open access mammography datasets is provided. This comprehensive review can serve as a thorough introduction to the use of prior information in breast cancer CAD systems but also provides indicative directions to guide future applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.