ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023
SCIBER: a simple method for removing batch effects from single-cell RNA-sequencing data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-cell and spatial profiling in cancer biology and clinical oncology.Nature cancer · 2026Review
- Bioinformatics perspectives on transcriptomics: A comprehensive review of bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing analyses.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2025Review
- GraphPCA: a fast and interpretable dimension reduction algorithm for spatial transcriptomics data.Genome biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
motivationIntegrative analysis of multiple single-cell RNA-sequencing datasets allows for more comprehensive characterizations of cell types, but systematic technical differences between datasets, known as 'batch effects', need to be removed before integration to avoid misleading interpretation of the data. Although many batch-effect-removal methods have been developed, there is still a large room for improvement: most existing methods only give dimension-reduced data instead of expression data of individual genes, are based on computationally demanding models and are black-box models and thus difficult to interpret or tune.
resultsHere, we present a new batch-effect-removal method called SCIBER (Single-Cell Integrator and Batch Effect Remover) and study its performance on real datasets. SCIBER matches cell clusters across batches according to the overlap of their differentially expressed genes. As a simple algorithm that has better scalability to data with a large number of cells and is easy to tune, SCIBER shows comparable and sometimes better accuracy in removing batch effects on real datasets compared to the state-of-the-art methods, which are much more complicated. Moreover, SCIBER outputs expression data in the original space, that is, the expression of individual genes, which can be used directly for downstream analyses. Additionally, SCIBER is a reference-based method, which assigns one of the batches as the reference batch and keeps it untouched during the process, making it especially suitable for integrating user-generated datasets with standard reference data such as the Human Cell Atlas. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SCIBER is publicly available as an R package on CRAN: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/SCIBER/. A vignette is included in the CRAN R package. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.