Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36548365›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

NanoSNP: a progressive and haplotype-aware SNP caller on low-coverage nanopore sequencing data.

Neng Huang, Minghua Xu, Fan Nie, Peng Ni, Chuan-Le Xiao, Feng Luo, Jianxin Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. mtDNA analysis using Mitopore.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Neng HuangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Minghua XuSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Fan NieSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Peng NiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Chuan-Le XiaoState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Feng LuoSchool of Computing, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4813-2403
Jianxin WangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1516-0480
Central South University · CNClemson University · USSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationOxford Nanopore sequencing has great potential and advantages in population-scale studies. Due to the cost of sequencing, the depth of whole-genome sequencing for per individual sample must be small. However, the existing single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) callers are aimed at high-coverage Nanopore sequencing reads. Detecting the SNP variants on low-coverage Nanopore sequencing data is still a challenging problem.

resultsWe developed a novel deep learning-based SNP calling method, NanoSNP, to identify the SNP sites (excluding short indels) based on low-coverage Nanopore sequencing reads. In this method, we design a multi-step, multi-scale and haplotype-aware SNP detection pipeline. First, the pileup model in NanoSNP utilizes the naive pileup feature to predict a subset of SNP sites with a Bi-long short-term memory (LSTM) network. These SNP sites are phased and used to divide the low-coverage Nanopore reads into different haplotypes. Finally, the long-range haplotype feature and short-range pileup feature are extracted from each haplotype. The haplotype model combines two features and predicts the genotype for the candidate site using a Bi-LSTM network. To evaluate the performance of NanoSNP, we compared NanoSNP with Clair, Clair3, Pepper-DeepVariant and NanoCaller on the low-coverage (∼16×) Nanopore sequencing reads. We also performed cross-genome testing on six human genomes HG002-HG007, respectively. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that NanoSNP outperforms Clair, Pepper-DeepVariant and NanoCaller in identifying SNPs on low-coverage Nanopore sequencing data, including the difficult-to-map regions and major histocompatibility complex regions in the human genome. NanoSNP is comparable to Clair3 when the coverage exceeds 16×. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/huangnengCSU/NanoSNP.git. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

NanoporesNanopore SequencingHaplotypesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNASoftware

Identifiers

PMID36548365
PMCPMC9822538
OpenAlexW4312090208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.