SynthesisPloS one2022
Prophylactic antibiotics on patients with cirrhosis and upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- KASL clinical practice guidelines for liver cirrhosis: Ascites and related complications 2026.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2026Article
- Harnessing the power of the gut microbiome: a review of supplementation diagnosis and therapy for liver cirrhosis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Review
- Prophylactic Antibiotic Use and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Child-Pugh A Cirrhosis and Acute Variceal Bleeding: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Article
- Splenic hamartoma mimicking angiosarcoma: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Hepatic encephalopathy: risk identification and prophylaxis approaches.Metabolic brain disease · 2025Review
- Evaluating the Clinical Endpoint of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Cirrhosis Patients Complicated with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Acta medica Philippina · 2025Article
- [Infections and liver cirrhosis].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024Review
- Antibiotics in Chronic Liver Disease and Their Effects on Gut Microbiota.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Effects of gastrointestinal endoscopy at different time points on diagnosis and treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effect of different prophylactic antibiotic treatments for cirrhosis patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) and to investigate whether prophylactic antibiotics are equally beneficial to reducing the risk of adverse outcomes in A/B with low Child-Pugh scores.
methodsRelevant studies were searched via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP databases up to July 16, 2021. The heterogeneity test was conducted for each outcome measuring by I2 statistics. Subgroup analysis was performed regarding antibiotic types. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate prophylactic antibiotics on the risk of adverse outcomes in cirrhosis patients with UGIB.
resultsTwenty-six studies involving 12,440 participants fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with a reduced overall mortality (RR: 0.691, 95%CI: 0.518 to 0.923), mortality due to bacterial infections (RR: 0.329, 95%CI: 0.144 to 0.754), bacterial infections (RR: 0.389, 95%CI: 0.340 to 0.444), rebleeding (RR: 0.577, 95%CI: 0.433 to 0.767) and length of hospitalization [weighted mean difference (WMD): -3.854, 95%CI: -6.165 to -1.543] among patients with UGIB. Nevertheless, prophylactic antibiotics may not benefit to A/B population with low Child-Pugh scores. In our subgroup analysis, quinolone, beta-lactams alone or in combination reduced adverse outcomes in cirrhosis patients with UGIB.
conclusionAdministration of antibiotics was associated with a reduction in mortality, bacterial infections, rebleeding, and length of hospitalization. Quinolone, beta-lactams alone or in combination can be used in cirrhosis patients with UGIB. Nevertheless, targeted efforts are needed to promote the appropriate use of antibiotics among patients with cirrhosis and UGIB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.