Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36548327›Full record

ArticlePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Public Perceptions of Community Pharmacy-Based Naloxone Services: A National Cross-Sectional Survey.

Lindsey A Hohmann, Zach Krauss, Jitisha Patel, Grace T Marley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lindsey A HohmannHarrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn University, 2316 Walker Building, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8348-0895
Zach KraussHealth Sciences Center, School of Pharmacy, Cedarville University, 251 N Main St., Cedarville, OH 45314, USA.
Jitisha PatelBernard J Dunn School of Pharmacy, Shenandoah University, 1775 N Sector Ct, Winchester, VA 22601, USA.
Grace T MarleyEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina (UNC), 301 Pharmacy Ln, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Cedarville University · USShenandoah University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USWalker (United States) · US

Funding

Auburn University No number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the general public's perceptions regarding community pharmacist-delivered naloxone services at the national level. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to describe the US general public's awareness, knowledge, beliefs, comfort, perceived barriers, abilities, and communication preferences related to community pharmacy-based naloxone services. A national, online cross-sectional survey was conducted in September 2021 among US adults ≥18 years recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Primary outcome measures were assessed via 5-point Likert-type scales, including: (1) naloxone awareness and knowledge; (2) naloxone beliefs; (3) comfort with pharmacist-provided naloxone; (4) perceived barriers to pharmacy-based naloxone; (5) opioid overdose competencies, concerns, and readiness; and (6) preferred pharmacist-patient naloxone communication strategy. Analyses included descriptive statistics and logistic regression models to assess predictors of preferred communication strategies. Of 301 respondents, 82.1% were White, 48.8% female, and mean 43 years. Eighty-five percent were unaware of pharmacy-provided naloxone and mean [SD] knowledge score was low (29.3% [16.8]). Mean [SD] beliefs (3.78 [0.61]) and comfort (3.70 [0.54]) were positive, while perceived barriers were low/neutral (2.93 [0.78]). For communication, 54% preferred general advertisement, 32.9% universal offer, and 13.3% targeted offer. The odds of preferring a general advertisement or universal offer over a targeted offer increased with greater awareness (AOR:4.52;

Indexed as

communicationcommunity pharmacycross-sectional surveyhealth outcomes researchnaloxoneopioidsperceptionssubstance abuse

Identifiers

PMID36548327
PMCPMC9781939
OpenAlexW4312125643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.