Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36548307›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Ambulatory assessment to predict problem anger in trauma-affected adults: Study protocol.

Olivia Metcalf, Laura Finlayson-Short, Karen E Lamb, Sophie Zaloumis, Meaghan L O'Donnell, Tianchen Qian, Tracey Varker, Sean Cowlishaw, Melissa Brotman, David Forbes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Olivia MetcalfDepartment of Psychiatry, Phoenix Australia, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9570-8463
Laura Finlayson-ShortDepartment of Psychiatry, Phoenix Australia, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0411-9319
Karen E LambCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Sophie ZaloumisCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8253-8896
Meaghan L O'DonnellDepartment of Psychiatry, Phoenix Australia, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Tianchen QianDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America.
Tracey VarkerDepartment of Psychiatry, Phoenix Australia, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7139-062X
Sean CowlishawDepartment of Psychiatry, Phoenix Australia, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Melissa BrotmanNeuroscience and Novel Therapeutics Unit, Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9859-4702
David ForbesDepartment of Psychiatry, Phoenix Australia, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProblem anger is common after experiencing a traumatic event. Current evidence-driven treatment options are limited, and problem anger negatively affects an individual's capacity to engage with traditional psychological treatments. Smartphone interventions hold significant potential in mental health because of their ability to deliver low-intensity, precision support for individuals at the time and place they need it most. While wearable technology has the capacity to augment smartphone-delivered interventions, there is a dearth of evidence relating to several key areas, including feasibility of compliance in mental health populations; validity of in vivo anger assessment; ability to predict future mood states; and delivery of timely and appropriate interventions.

methodsThis protocol describes a cohort study that leverages 10 days of ambulatory assessment in the form of ecological momentary assessment and a wearable. Approximately 100 adults with problem anger will complete four-hourly in vivo mobile application-delivered micro-surveys on anger intensity, frequency, and verbal and physical aggression, as well as other self-reported mental health and wellbeing measures. Concurrently, a commercial wearable device will continuously record indicators of physiological arousal. The aims are to test the feasibility and acceptability of ambulatory assessment in a trauma-affected population, and determine whether a continuously measured physiological indicator of stress predicts self-reported anger intensity. DISCUSSION: This study will contribute new data around the ability of physiological indicators to predict mood state in individuals with psychopathology. This will have important implications for the design of smartphone-delivered interventions for trauma-affected individuals, as well as for the digital mental health field more broadly.

Indexed as

AngerMental HealthAdultAggressionCohort StudiesHumansSmartphone

Identifiers

PMID36548307
PMCPMC9778625
OpenAlexW4312090145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.