Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36548271›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Metabolic differences and differentially expressed genes between C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mice substrains.

Shino Nemoto, Tetsuya Kubota, Hiroshi Ohno

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Selective modulation of murine intestinal MAmerican journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Brain-Specific Gata4 Downregulation in Greywick Female Mice Models the Metabolic Subtype of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shino NemotoLaboratory for Intestinal Ecosystem, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0086-9817
Tetsuya KubotaLaboratory for Intestinal Ecosystem, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hiroshi OhnoLaboratory for Intestinal Ecosystem, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Kanagawa, Japan.
Chiba University · JPRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences · JPToho University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

C57BL/6J (B6J) and C57BL/6N (B6N) mice are the most frequently used substrains in C57BL/6 (B6) inbred mice, serving as physiological models for in vivo studies and as background strains to build transgenic mice. However, the differences in metabolic phenotypes between B6J and B6N mice are not coherent, and genotypic differences in metabolically important tissues have not been well studied. The phenotypic differences between B6J and B6N substrains have often been attributed to the role of the nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase (Nnt) gene, whereby B6J has a spontaneous missense mutation of Nnt. Nevertheless, phenotypic differences between the two cannot be explained by Nnt mutations alone, especially in metabolic traits. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the genetic cause of the phenotypic differences between B6J and B6N mice. Determining consistent genetic differences across multiple tissues involved in metabolic traits such as subcutaneous and visceral white adipose tissues, brown adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, liver, hypothalamus, and hippocampus, may help explain phenotypic differences in metabolism between the two substrains. We report candidate genes along with comparative data on body weight, tissue weight, blood components involved in metabolism, and energy balance of B6J and B6N mice. Insulin degrading enzyme, adenylosuccinate synthase 2, and ectonucleotide triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 4 were highly expressed in B6J mice compared with those in B6N mice, and Nnt, WD repeat and FYVE domain containing 1, and dynein light chain Tctex-type 1 were less expressed in B6J mice compared with those in B6N mice in all seven tissues. Considering the extremely wide use of both substrains and their critical importance in generating transgenic and knock-out models, these findings guide future research across several interrelated fields.

Indexed as

MetabolismMice, Inbred C57BLAnimalsGenotypeMiceMice, TransgenicMutationNADP TranshydrogenasesNADP Transhydrogenases

Identifiers

PMID36548271
PMCPMC9778930
OpenAlexW4312091533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.