Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36548264›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Comparison of the movement behaviour of experienced and novice performers during the Cat exercise.

Ann Hallemans, Emmanuel Jacobs, Jan Gielen, Luc Van Den Dries, Annouk Van Moorsel, Fabien Buisseret, Frédéric Dierick, Nathalie Roussel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ann HallemansDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences (REVAKI/Movant), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4101-5279
Emmanuel JacobsDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences (REVAKI/Movant), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Jan GielenDepartment of Sports Medicine and Radiology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Luc Van Den DriesResearch Center for Visual Poetics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Annouk Van MoorselRoyal Conservatoire, Artesis Plantijn Hogeschool Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium.
Fabien BuisseretCeREF-Technique, Mons, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7801-036X
Frédéric DierickCeREF-Technique, Mons, Belgium.
Nathalie RousselDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences (REVAKI/Movant), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two previous studies showed kinematic differences between novice and experienced performers during unchoreographed movements executed in standing position. However, no study explores if these kinematic differences holds during unchoreographed movements executed in quadrupedal position. The aim of this study is to compare the movement behaviour of experienced and novice performers during an exercise wherein they are challenged to use dynamic and largely unchoreographed movement patterns executed in quadrupedal position. The exercise studied was the Cat exercise, in which participants were asked to behave like a feline for 10 minutes. An inventory of the chosen movements and the assessment of their average and coefficient of variation of the ground contact temporal parameters, computed by analysing the tri-dimensional whole-body kinematics of 25 performers (n = 13 novices and n = 12 experienced), was compared according to their experience level. No significant difference was found between the groups for the number of chosen movements, and median or coefficient of variation of ground contact temporal parameters, except for a greater foot/ knee swing coefficient of variation in experienced performers. This suggests that biomechanical constraints induced by quadrupedal position "prevent" a different selection of motor strategies by experienced performers, although the latter can be more variable in their movements.

Indexed as

Lower ExtremityMovementAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCatsHumansKneeKnee Joint

Identifiers

PMID36548264
PMCPMC9779039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.