ArticlePloS one2022
Tuberculosis yield among contacts of non-pulmonary bacteriologically confirmed index TB patients in the urban setting of central Uganda.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combination interventions to control the tuberculosis epidemic in the Karamoja subregion of Uganda: A modelling analysis.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Optimization of Case Finding and Preventive Treatment Among Household Contacts of People with Tuberculosis in Zimbabwe.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
- TB yields from expanded contact tracing investigations.Public health action · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) recommends systematic and active investigation of TB contacts. However, lower priority is given to contact investigation among other non-pulmonary bacteriologically confirmed (PBC) cases; it thus contributes to the scarce information on the yield of TB among contacts of index TB patients without microbiological confirmation (non-PBC patients). This study therefore aimed at establishing the yield of TB among contacts of PBC and non-PBC index TB patients in the urban setting of central Uganda.
methodsWe abstracted data from the Uganda national TB contact investigation registers present at 48 health facilities for the period January 2018 to August 2020. The screening yield for both PBC and non-PBC, timing of TB diagnosis among contacts were determined. Logistic regression was used to examine predictors for diagnosing contacts as non PBC TB patients.
resultsFrom January 2018 to August 2020, 234 persons were diagnosed with TB from a total of 14,275 contacts traced for both PBC and non-PBC TB index patients at 48 facilities. Of these, 100(42.7%) were contacts of non-PBC index patients. TB screening yield was higher among contacts of non PBC 100(2.0%) compared to 134(1.4%) among contacts of PBC index patients. For both groups, over 80% of their contacts were diagnosed with TB within 3 months from the day of TB treatment start of the index case. On multivariate logistic regression the only predictor for diagnosing contacts as non PBC TB patients was age under15 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 7.53, 95% CI [3.27-17.3] p = <0.05).
conclusionThe yield of TB among contacts of non-PBC index case is nearly the same for contacts of PBC index cases and most contacts were diagnosed with TB disease during the intensive TB treatment phase of the index case. There was no association between the type of TB (PBC, non-PBC) disease diagnosed in the contacts, and that of index TB patients. To improve TB case-finding, emphasis should be placed on contact investigation for household and close contacts of all other index cases with pulmonary tuberculosis regardless of whether PBC or non-PBC during the intensive phase of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.