Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36548245›Full record

ReviewPLoS pathogens2022

Epitranscriptomics in parasitic protists: Role of RNA chemical modifications in posttranscriptional gene regulation.

Cassandra Catacalos, Alexander Krohannon, Sahiti Somalraju, Kate D Meyer, Sarath Chandra Janga, Kausik Chakrabarti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS pathogens, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Molecular mechanisms involved inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2023
    Article
  10. mRNA vaccines in disease prevention and treatment.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  11. Ghost authors revealed: The structure and function of human NWiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cassandra CatacalosDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States of America.
Alexander KrohannonDepartment of BioHealth Informatics, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America.
Sahiti SomalrajuDepartment of BioHealth Informatics, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America.
Kate D MeyerDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Sarath Chandra JangaDepartment of BioHealth Informatics, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America.
Kausik ChakrabartiDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0647-7411
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte · USDuke University · US

Funding

Mapping RNA protein interaction networks in the human genomeR01GM123314 · NIGMS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI JANGA, SARATH CHANDRA · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

"Epitranscriptomics" is the new RNA code that represents an ensemble of posttranscriptional RNA chemical modifications, which can precisely coordinate gene expression and biological processes. There are several RNA base modifications, such as N6-methyladenosine (m6A), 5-methylcytosine (m5C), and pseudouridine (Ψ), etc. that play pivotal roles in fine-tuning gene expression in almost all eukaryotes and emerging evidences suggest that parasitic protists are no exception. In this review, we primarily focus on m6A, which is the most abundant epitranscriptomic mark and regulates numerous cellular processes, ranging from nuclear export, mRNA splicing, polyadenylation, stability, and translation. We highlight the universal features of spatiotemporal m6A RNA modifications in eukaryotic phylogeny, their homologs, and unique processes in 3 unicellular parasites-Plasmodium sp., Toxoplasma sp., and Trypanosoma sp. and some technological advances in this rapidly developing research area that can significantly improve our understandings of gene expression regulation in parasites.

Indexed as

ParasitesRNAAnimalsEukaryotaGene Expression RegulationPolyadenylationRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalRNA

Identifiers

PMID36548245
PMCPMC9778586
OpenAlexW4312091578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.