Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36548241›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Phytogenics and encapsulated sodium butyrate can replace antibiotics as growth promoters for lightly weaned piglets.

Caio Abércio da Silva, Cleandro Pazinato Dias, Marco Aurélio Callegari, Gabrieli de Souza Romano, Kelly Lais de Souza, David Vanni Jacob, Alexandre José Ulbrich, Tim Goossens

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caio Abércio da SilvaAnimal Sciences Department, Center of Agrarian Sciences, State University of Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9123-0343
Cleandro Pazinato DiasAkei Animal Research, Fartura, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marco Aurélio CallegariAkei Animal Research, Fartura, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3758-9907
Gabrieli de Souza RomanoAkei Animal Research, Fartura, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4117-1880
Kelly Lais de SouzaAkei Animal Research, Fartura, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5671-7287
David Vanni JacobNutriad Animal Nutrition Ltda., Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alexandre José UlbrichNutriad Animal Nutrition Ltda., Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tim GoossensNutriad Animal Nutrition Ltda., Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Londrina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of essential oils plus dry herbs (PHYTO) and encapsulated sodium butyrate (BUT) supplementation compared with enramycin (ENR), as a growth promoter, on the performance, diarrhoea control and intestinal microbiota in lightly weaned piglets. Two hundred weaned piglets, 20 days old, 4.69 ± 0.56 kg, were submitted during the nursery phase (20 to 69 days of age) to four treatments: control (CTR)-without any additive supplementation; ENR (with 8 ppm of enramycin throughout), BUT (with 2000 ppm between 20 to 34 d, 1500 ppm between 34 to 48 d and 1000 ppm between 48 to 69 d), and PHYTO (150 ppm between 20 to 48 d). At 62 days old, forty piglets (10 replicates per treatment) were slaughtered to perform bacterial identification through 16S rRNA (V3-V4) sequencing of the caecal content. During the second phase of the trial (34 to 48 days), the BUT group showed higher DWG (P = 0.023) and BW (P = 0.039) than the CTR group, and all groups that received additives had better FCR than the CTR group (P = 0.001). In the last phase of the trial (48 to 69 days), the ENR group presented a better FCR (P = 0.054) than the CRT and other groups. In the total period (20 to 69 days), ENR and BUT showed better FCR (P = 0.006) than CRT. Diarrhoea incident data showed differences (P<0.05), favouring the BUT treatment compared to the CTR. Only the Megasphaeraceae and Streptococcaceae families showed differences (p<0.05) in relative abundance between CTR and PHYTO and between CTR and BUT, respectively. Differential abundances of the Megasphaera and Streptococcus genera were observed between CTR and PHYTO and CTR and BUT. Phytogenics and encapsulated sodium butyrate are able and effective for modulating the specific caecal microbiota, improving performance and controlling diarrhoea occurrence.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDietAnimalsButyric AcidDiarrheaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSwineAnti-Bacterial AgentsButyric AcidRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID36548241
PMCPMC9778559
OpenAlexW4312091518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.