Observational studyNursing open2023
Comparison of two instruments for hypertension self-care assessments among older adults from China.
Observational study in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Assessing implementation outcomes from studies addressing medication adherence for hypertension management in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Use of the Hypertension Self-Care Profile: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Comparison of two instruments for hypertension self-care assessments among older adults from China.Nursing open · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo test and compare the Self-Care of Hypertension Inventory (SC-HI) and Hypertension Self-Care Profile (HBP SCP) among older patients with hypertension in China.
designA cross-sectional observational study.
methodsA convenience sampling of 220 older adults (120 male patients and 100 female patients) with hypertension and a mean age of 73.74 years was surveyed using the Chinese version of SC-HI, the Chinese version of HBP SCP and the Chinese version of Exercise of Self-Care Agency Scale (ESCA) during July-September 2019. Psychometric analyses and Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analyses were performed on the collected data.
resultsThe Cronbach's α of SC-HI and HBP SCP was 0.858 and 0.953, respectively. The Pearson's coefficients between the SC-HI total score and the ESCA total score, the HBP SCP total score and the ESCA total score were 0.494 and 0.700, respectively. The satisfactory sensitivity, specificity, cut-off point and Area under the curve of SC-HI were 0.8292, 0.5495, 120.5 and 0.754, respectively. As for HBP SCP, the values were 0.7907, 0.7582, 169.5 and 0.838, respectively. There was no significant difference between these two scales. Each has its own characteristics. However, the HBP SCP is more precise and effective for measuring self-care ability in older patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.