Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36548061›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance2023

A dual-task approach to inform the taxonomy of inhibition-related processes.

Patrick G Bissett, Henry M Jones, McKenzie P Hagen, Tung T Bui, Jamie K Li, Jaime Ali H Rios, Jeanette A Mumford, James M Shine, Russell A Poldrack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Patrick G BissettDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University.ORCID 0000-0003-0854-9404
Henry M JonesDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University.
McKenzie P HagenDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University.
Tung T BuiDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University.
Jamie K LiDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University.
Jaime Ali H RiosDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University.
Jeanette A MumfordDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University.
James M ShineBrain and Mind Center, University of Sydney.ORCID 0000-0003-1762-5499
Russell A PoldrackDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University.

Funding

Characterizing cognitive control networks using a precision neuroscience approachR01MH117772 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI POLDRACK, RUSSELL A · 2018 to 2022
$2.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Response inhibition is key to controlled behavior and is commonly investigated with the stop-signal paradigm. The authors investigated how response inhibition is situated within a taxonomy of control processes by combining multiple forms of control within dual tasks. Response inhibition, as measured by stop-signal reaction time (SSRT), was impaired when combined with shape matching, but not the flanker task, and when combined with cued task switching, but not predictable task switching, suggesting that response inhibition may be weakly or variably impaired when combined with selective attention and set shifting demands, respectively. Response inhibition was also consistently impaired when combined with the N-back or directed forgetting tasks, putative measures of working memory. Impairments of response inhibition by other control demands appeared to be primarily driven by task context, as SSRT slowing was similar for trials where control demands were either high (e.g., task switch) or low (e.g., task stay). These results demonstrate that response inhibition processes are often impaired in the context of other control demands, even on trials where direct engagement of those other control processes is not required. This suggests a taxonomy of control in which response inhibition overlaps with related control processes, especially working memory. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Attentional BiasInhibition, PsychologicalMental ProcessesReaction TimeHumans

Identifiers

PMID36548061
PMCPMC10257953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.