Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36547947›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2022

Association of Medicare Beneficiary and Hospital Accountable Care Organization Alignment With Surgical Cost Savings.

Lindsey A Herrel, Phyllis Yan, Parth Modi, Julia Adler-Milstein, Andrew M Ryan, John M Hollingsworth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lindsey A HerrelDow Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Phyllis YanDow Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Parth ModiDepartment of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Julia Adler-MilsteinCenter for Clinical Informatics and Improvement Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
Andrew M RyanDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
John M HollingsworthDow Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.

Funding

Accelerating the Shift to Downside Risk in Medicare Accountable Care Organizations: Effects on Clinical Quality and Costs among Older PatientsR01AG068074 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HOLLENBECK, BRENT K. · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
Assessing the Effects of Accountable Care Organizations on Surgical Spending and QualityR01HS024525 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HOLLINGSWORTH, JOHN MALCOLM · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
Understanding the effects of the Oncology Care Model on cancer care for dual eligible patientsK08CA237638 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HERREL, LINDSEY ALLISON · 2019 to 2023
$1.1M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS024525NCI NIH HHS K08 CA237638NIA NIH HHS R01 AG068074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Although Medicare accountable care organizations (ACOs) account for half of program expenditures, whether ACOs are associated with surgical spending warrants further study. Objective: To assess whether greater beneficiary-hospital ACO alignment was associated with lower surgical episode costs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2020 and 2022 using US Medicare data from a 20% random sample of beneficiaries. Individuals 18 years of age and older and without kidney failure who had a surgical admission between 2008 and 2015 were included. For each study year, distinction was made between beneficiaries assigned to an ACO and those who were not, as well as between admissions to ACO-participating and nonparticipating hospitals. Exposures: Time-varying binary indicators for beneficiary ACO assignment and hospital ACO participation and an interaction between them. Main Outcomes and Measures: Ninety-day, price-standardized total episode payments. Multivariable 2-way fixed-effects models were estimated. Results: During the study period, 2 797 337 surgical admissions (6% of which involved ACO-assigned beneficiaries) occurred at 3427 hospitals (17% ACO participating). Total Medicare payments for 90-day surgical episodes were lowest when ACO-assigned beneficiaries underwent surgery at a hospital participating in the same ACO as the beneficiary ($26 635 [95% CI, $26 426-$26 844]). The highest payments were for unassigned beneficiaries treated at participating hospitals ($27 373 [95% CI, $27 232-$27 514]) or nonparticipating hospitals ($27 303 [95% CI, $27 291-$27 314]). Assigned beneficiaries treated at hospitals participating in a different ACO and assigned beneficiaries treated at nonparticipating hospitals had similar payments (for participating hospitals, $27 003 [95% CI, $26 739-$27 267] and for nonparticipating hospitals, $26 928 [95% CI, $26 796-$27 059]). A notable factor in the observed differences in surgical episode costs was lower spending on postacute care services. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study evaluating hospital and beneficiary ACO alignment and surgical spending, savings were noted for beneficiaries treated at hospitals in the same ACO. Allowing ACOs to encourage or require surgical procedures in their own hospitals could lower Medicare spending on surgery.

Indexed as

Accountable Care OrganizationsAdolescentAdultAgedCohort StudiesCost SavingsHospitalsHumansMedicareRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36547947
PMCPMC9857079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.