Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36547773›Full record

ReviewJournal of nephrology2023

Toward generalizing the use of artificial intelligence in nephrology and kidney transplantation.

Samarra Badrouchi, Mohamed Mongi Bacha, Hafedh Hedri, Taieb Ben Abdallah, Ezzedine Abderrahim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nephrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samarra BadrouchiDepartment of Internal Medicine A, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia. samarra.nephro@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5366-069X
Mohamed Mongi BachaDepartment of Internal Medicine A, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
Hafedh HedriDepartment of Internal Medicine A, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
Taieb Ben AbdallahDepartment of Internal Medicine A, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
Ezzedine AbderrahimDepartment of Internal Medicine A, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With its robust ability to integrate and learn from large sets of clinical data, artificial intelligence (AI) can now play a role in diagnosis, clinical decision making, and personalized medicine. It is probably the natural progression of traditional statistical techniques. Currently, there are many unmet needs in nephrology and, more particularly, in the kidney transplantation (KT) field. The complexity and increase in the amount of data, and the multitude of nephrology registries worldwide have enabled the explosive use of AI within the field. Nephrologists in many countries are already at the center of experiments and advances in this cutting-edge technology and our aim is to generalize the use of AI among nephrologists worldwide. In this paper, we provide an overview of AI from a medical perspective. We cover the core concepts of AI relevant to the practicing nephrologist in a consistent and simple way to help them get started, and we discuss the technical challenges. Finally, we focus on the KT field: the unmet needs and the potential role that AI can play to fill these gaps, then we summarize the published KT-related studies, including predictive factors used in each study, which will allow researchers to quickly focus on the most relevant issues.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationNephrologyArtificial IntelligenceClinical Decision-MakingHumansNephrologistsArtificial intelligenceKidney transplantationMachine learningNephrology

Identifiers

PMID36547773
PMCPMC9773693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.