ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2023
Comparison of axial and coronal axis MRI kidney volume measurement in pediatric congenital solitary kidney.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate estimation of kidney size and volume in the solitary functioning kidney is crucial because of a higher risk of developing kidney injury. MRI is an accurate method and is suitable for kidney volume measurement. Usually, axial axis images and measurement methods are preferred for kidney volume measurements. However, the anteroposterior diameter of the kidney is smaller than the longitudinal diameter, meaning that imaging in the coronal axis could provide needed information in a shorter time, enabling imaging of younger patients without sedation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare coronal and axial axis kidney volume measurement methods and evaluate intra-observer and inter-observer reliability.
methodsAxial axis T2W and coronal axis FIESTA images of kidneys were obtained with 10 mm slice thickness and no slice gap in pediatric patients with congenital solitary kidneys. Free-hand manual tracing was used to calculate volumes in both methods. Images were analyzed by two operators with different levels of experience. The expert operator computed solitary kidney volume twice in both methods for the intra-observer reliability, while the beginner operator's measurements were used for the inter-observer reliability.
resultsHigh intra-observer (0.965 for axial and 0.972 for coronal) and inter-observer reliability were revealed (0.964 for axial and 0.963 for the coronal) for both measurement methods.
conclusionThe coronal plane volume measurement method, which has a significantly shorter examination and post-processing time, is a highly reproducible and reliable method that can enable volume measurement with MRI in younger children, as the imaging time will be shortened. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36547734What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.