Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36547711›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Parosmia as a predictor of a better olfactory function in COVID-19: a multicentric longitudinal study for upper respiratory tract infections.

Susanne Menzel, Antje Haehner, Dorothea Woosch, Belinda Marquardt, Cristina Ressel, Julia Draf, Giancarlo Ottaviano, Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo, Romina Kardashi, Katja de With and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Factors Associated With Persisting Olfactory Dysfunction After COVID-19.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Assessment of olfactory recovery after COVID-19: cross-sectional study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  10. Recovery rates and long-term olfactory dysfunction following COVID-19 infection.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Orthonasal and retronasal odor identification in patients with parosmia.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Susanne MenzelSmell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, TU Dresden Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus: Technische Universitat Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. susanne.menzel@uniklinikum-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7650-1731
Antje HaehnerSmell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, TU Dresden Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus: Technische Universitat Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Dorothea WooschSmell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, TU Dresden Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus: Technische Universitat Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Belinda MarquardtSmell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, TU Dresden Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus: Technische Universitat Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Cristina ResselSmell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, TU Dresden Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus: Technische Universitat Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Julia DrafSmell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, TU Dresden Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus: Technische Universitat Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Giancarlo OttavianoDepartment of Neurosciences-ENT Section, University-Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Paolo Boscolo-RizzoDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Section of Otolaryngology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Romina KardashiDivision of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Katja de WithDivision of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Yvonne HacklDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Sauerbruchstraße 6, 86179, Augsburg, Germany.
Thomas HummelSmell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, TU Dresden Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus: Technische Universitat Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity Hospital Augsburg · DEUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Trieste · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the course of olfactory dysfunction [OD] due to upper respiratory tract infections [URTI] especially for COVID-19 [C19] in a multicentric design and to investigate possible predictors for the outcome.

methodsIn a multicentric study, patients (n = 147, of which 96 were women) with OD due to URTI, including C19 and non-C19 were evaluated at two visits with a standardized medical history and "Sniffin' Sticks" extended psychophysical testing to examine the course and possible predictors for improvement of olfactory function.

resultsC19 patients showed better overall olfactory function (p < 0.001) compared to non-C19. Olfactory function (p < 0.001) improved over 3.5 ± 1.2 months in a comparable fashion for C19 and non-C19 comparable over time (p = 0.20) except for a more pronounced improvement of odour threshold (p = 0.03) in C19. C19 patients with parosmia exhibited a higher probability of clinically relevant improvement of odour threshold, a better threshold in the second visit, and tended to have a better TDI-score at the second visit. Further possible predictors for an improving olfactory function were younger age, female gender, and had lower scores in olfactory tests at the first visit.

conclusionsPatients with C19 and non-C19 URTI exhibit a similar improvement over 3-4 months except for the odour threshold, with a better TDI in both visits for C19. For C19 a better prognosis in terms of olfactory recovery was found for younger patients with parosmia and lower olfactory scores at the first visit. Still, for many patients with olfactory loss, an improvement that is experienced as complete may only occur over months and possibly years.

Indexed as

COVID-19Olfaction DisordersRespiratory Tract InfectionsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleSmellCOVID-19Olfactory dysfunctionParosmiaSmell

Identifiers

PMID36547711
PMCPMC9773662
OpenAlexW4312076149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.