ArticleEuropean radiology2023
Prediction of the characteristics of aggressiveness of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) based on CT radiomic features.
Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence versus conventional imaging for differentiating G2/G3 from G1 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Imaging: A Systematic Review.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Pooled it
- Predicting histologic grades for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors by radiologic image-based artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Development and validation of a CT-based nomogram to preoperative prediction of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) grade.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors through analysis of portal venous phase CT images.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Management of patients with small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from a biomarker and surgical perspective.Endocrine-related cancer · 2025Review
- EUS-based intratumoral and peritumoral machine learning radiomics analysis for distinguishing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- A CT-based interpretable machine learning model for preoperative prediction of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor aggressiveness.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Radiomics in advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Identifying responders to somatostatin analogs.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2025Article
- A novel model for predicting postoperative liver metastasis in R0 resected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: integrating computational pathology and deep learning-radiomics.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Accuracy and Prognostic Impact of Nodal Status on Preoperative Imaging for Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Endoscopic ultrasonography-based intratumoral and peritumoral machine learning radiomics analyses for distinguishing insulinomas from non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Diagnostic work-up and advancement in the diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Review
- Prediction of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor grading using an artificial intelligence-based video analysis model (GradAINet) applied to contrast-enhanced EUS videos.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo predict tumor grade (G1 vs. G2/3), presence of distant metastasis (M+), metastatic lymph nodes (N+), and microvascular invasion (VI) of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNEN) based on preoperative CT radiomic features (RFs), by applying a machine learning approach aimed to limit overfit.
methodsThis retrospective study included 101 patients who underwent surgery for PanNEN; the entire population was split into training (n = 70) and validation cohort (n = 31). Based on a previously validated methodology, after tumor segmentation on contrast-enhanced CT, RFs were extracted from unenhanced CT images. In addition, conventional radiological and clinical features were combined with RFs into multivariate logistic regression models using minimum redundancy and a bootstrap-based machine learning approach. For each endpoint, models were trained and validated including only RFs (RF_model), and both (radiomic and clinicoradiological) features (COMB_model).
resultsTwenty-five patients had G2/G3 tumor, 37 N+, and 14 M+ and 38 were shown to have VI. From a total of 182 RFs initially extracted, few independent radiomic and clinicoradiological features were identified. For M+ and G, the resulting models showed moderate to high performances: areas under the curve (AUC) for training/validation cohorts were 0.85/0.77 (RF_model) and 0.81/0.81 (COMB_model) for M+ and 0.67/0.72 and 0.68/0.70 for G. Concerning N+ and VI, only the COMB_model could be built, with poorer performance for N+ (AUC = 0.72/0.61) compared to VI (0.82/0.75). For all endpoints, the negative predictive value was good (≥ 0.75).
conclusionsCombining few radiomic and clinicoradiological features resulted in presurgical prediction of histological characteristics of PanNENs. Despite the limited risk of overfit, external validations are warranted. KEY POINTS: • Histology is the only tool currently available allowing characterization of PanNEN biological characteristics important for prognostic assessment; significant limitations to this approach exist. • Based upon preoperative contrast-enhanced CT images, a machine learning approach optimized to favor models' generalizability was successfully applied to train predictive models for tumor grading (G1 vs. G2/3), microvascular invasion, metastatic lymph nodes, and distant metastatic spread. • Moderate to high discriminative models (AUC: 0.67-0.85) based on few parameters (≤ 3) showing high negative predictive value (0.75-0.98) were generated and then successfully validated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36547673What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.