Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36547547›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2022

Biomechanical Testing of Two-Unit Bridges and a Comparison of Replacement Retention Depending on a Cementation Medium, Replacement Position, and Gap Size.

Alena Findrik Balogová, Viktória Rajťúková, Ľuboš Chromý, Andrej Somoš, Gabriela Ižaríková, Radovan Hudák

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alena Findrik BalogováDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Measurement, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-2135-8330
Viktória RajťúkováDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Measurement, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-7180-2874
Ľuboš ChromýDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Measurement, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia.
Andrej SomošClinic of Pneumology and Phthisiology, L. Pasteur University Hospital Košice, 040 11 Košice, Slovakia.
Gabriela IžaríkováDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Informatics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia.
Radovan HudákDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Measurement, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia.

Funding

Additive manufacturing in medicine - creation of multimedia material and tools to support teaching in biomedical engineering KEGA 050TUKE-4/2022Bioresorbable materials for additive manufacturing of vessel substituents and their biomechanical characterization APVV-20-0068Center for Advanced Therapies od Chronic Inflammatory Diseas of the Locomotion ITMS2014+: 313011W410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental replacements are placed between the abutment teeth. The exceptions are two-unit bridges, as they are supported by a single tooth prepared only on one side of the missing tooth. The presented study deals with an analysis of a pressure force action on two-unit bridges placed in the frontal part (20 samples), where the pressure action is lower, and in the distal part (20 samples), where the pressure action is higher. A CAD program by 3Shape was used for digital designing with two different gap settings, 10 μm (20 samples) and 30 μm (20 samples). Two-unit bridges were attached to the prepared tooth using two types of dental cement (20/20 samples), which were selected for their physical and bioactive properties. All two-unit bridges (a total of 80 samples) were fabricated from CoCr alloys on Mlab cusing R by applying the Selective Laser Melting (SLM) technology. Mechanical testing was performed using the Inspekt5 table blue. The obtained data were used to verify the hypotheses-a difference between both types of cement (A ≠ B), a difference between the frontal and distal two-unit bridges (F ≠ D) and a difference between the gap sizes (10 ≠ 30). To confirm the given theories, data were statistically evaluated using the F-test and subsequent

Indexed as

biomechanical testingcobalt-chromedental cementdental replacementsgap size

Identifiers

PMID36547547
PMCPMC9788551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.