ArticleJournal of imaging2022
Fully Automated Segmentation Models of Supratentorial Meningiomas Assisted by Inclusion of Normal Brain Images.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Performance of Convolutional Neural Network Models in Meningioma Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neuroinformatics · 2025Pooled it
- Deep Learning for Automated Detection and Segmentation of Meningioma on Multiparametric MRI.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Establishment and evaluation of an automatic multi?sequence MRI segmentation model of primary central nervous system lymphoma based on the nnU?Net deep learning network method.Oncology letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To train an automatic brain tumor segmentation model, a large amount of data is required. In this paper, we proposed a strategy to overcome the limited amount of clinically collected magnetic resonance image (MRI) data regarding meningiomas by pre-training a model using a larger public dataset of MRIs of gliomas and augmenting our meningioma training set with normal brain MRIs. Pre-operative MRIs of 91 meningioma patients (171 MRIs) and 10 non-meningioma patients (normal brains) were collected between 2016 and 2019. Three-dimensional (3D) U-Net was used as the base architecture. The model was pre-trained with BraTS 2019 data, then fine-tuned with our datasets consisting of 154 meningioma MRIs and 10 normal brain MRIs. To increase the utility of the normal brain MRIs, a novel balanced Dice loss (BDL) function was used instead of the conventional soft Dice loss function. The model performance was evaluated using the Dice scores across the remaining 17 meningioma MRIs. The segmentation performance of the model was sequentially improved via the pre-training and inclusion of normal brain images. The Dice scores improved from 0.72 to 0.76 when the model was pre-trained. The inclusion of normal brain MRIs to fine-tune the model improved the Dice score; it increased to 0.79. When employing BDL as the loss function, the Dice score reached 0.84. The proposed learning strategy for U-net showed potential for use in segmenting meningioma lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.