Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36547488›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2022

Disease Recognition in X-ray Images with Doctor Consultation-Inspired Model.

Kim Anh Phung, Thuan Trong Nguyen, Nileshkumar Wangad, Samah Baraheem, Nguyen D Vo, Khang Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kim Anh PhungDepartment of Computer Science, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH 45469, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4561-7536
Thuan Trong NguyenFaculty of Software Engineering, University of Information Technology, Linh Trung Ward, Thu Duc District, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0001-7729-2927
Nileshkumar WangadDepartment of Computer Science, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH 45469, USA.
Samah BaraheemDepartment of Computer Science, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH 45469, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4742-6861
Nguyen D VoFaculty of Software Engineering, University of Information Technology, Linh Trung Ward, Thu Duc District, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam.
Khang NguyenFaculty of Software Engineering, University of Information Technology, Linh Trung Ward, Thu Duc District, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of chest X-ray imaging for early disease screening is attracting interest from the computer vision and deep learning community. To date, various deep learning models have been applied in X-ray image analysis. However, models perform inconsistently depending on the dataset. In this paper, we consider each individual model as a medical doctor. We then propose a doctor consultation-inspired method that fuses multiple models. In particular, we consider both early and late fusion mechanisms for consultation. The early fusion mechanism combines the deep learned features from multiple models, whereas the late fusion method combines the confidence scores of all individual models. Experiments on two X-ray imaging datasets demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method relative to baseline. The experimental results also show that early consultation consistently outperforms the late consultation mechanism in both benchmark datasets. In particular, the early doctor consultation-inspired model outperforms all individual models by a large margin, i.e., 3.03 and 1.86 in terms of accuracy in the UIT COVID-19 and chest X-ray datasets, respectively.

Indexed as

disease recognitiondoctor consultation-inspiredmedical image processing

Identifiers

PMID36547488
PMCPMC9786084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.